Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[antennaware\]\s+160M\s+antenna\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[antennaware\]\s+160M\s+antenna\!\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [antennaware] 160M antenna! (score: 1): Author: larsmark@swipnet.se (Mikael Larsmark - SM3WMV -); Date: Sun, 9 May 1999 11:08:30 +0200; Hi, its me again :-) A new question. Im switching to another qth as i said before and i have no experience of 160M. I need a good antenna for 160m. I got tree's there that are about 20-25meters high,; /archives//html/Antennaware/1999-05/msg00003.html (7,259 bytes)
2. [antennaware] 160M antenna! (score: 1): Author: wx0b@arraysolutions.com (Jay Terleski); Date: Sat, 8 May 1999 07:32:15 -0500; Inverted Ls work very well on 160. You could do one or if you want some gain phase two of them. Both in phase and both out of phase 180 degrees. The use of shortened raised radials is also becoming p; /archives//html/Antennaware/1999-05/msg00004.html (8,685 bytes)
3. SV: [antennaware] 160M antenna! (score: 1): Author: larsmark@swipnet.se (Mikael Larsmark - SM3WMV -); Date: Sun, 9 May 1999 20:05:31 +0200; Hello! again! I think that im going to try an Inverted L antenna. About stacking to togheter, can i get some more information about that than i would be happy. Isnt there possible to build a own stac; /archives//html/Antennaware/1999-05/msg00005.html (7,253 bytes)
4. [antennaware] 160M antenna! (score: 1): Author: Clive Hollins" <gfv91@dial.pipex.com (Clive Hollins); Date: Sun, 9 May 1999 18:58:12 +0100; Another thing you can do is build a folded dipole on 160. The Z for one of these would be 300 Ohms in free space but near the ground the Z drops significantly. A Friend of mine built one over a quarr; /archives//html/Antennaware/1999-05/msg00006.html (7,630 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]