Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[antennaware\]\s+Minninec\s+\&\s+Nec2\s+differences\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[antennaware\]\s+Minninec\s+\&\s+Nec2\s+differences\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [antennaware] Minninec & Nec2 differences (score: 1): Author: Patrick.Wintheiser@PSS.Boeing.com (Wintheiser, Patrick); Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1998 16:22:26 -0800; I'm curious about the differences in reports from Minninec and Nec2. Using AO and NW form K6STI, AO reports peak gain for azimuth and elevation. Plots also show current on the wires. NW does not give; /archives//html/Antennaware/1998-12/msg00017.html (7,697 bytes)
2. [antennaware] Minninec & Nec2 differences (score: 1): Author: gary@noblepub.com (Gary Breed); Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1998 10:37:51 -0500; Pat The answer is a qualified "No, these data formats are not inherent to NEC or MININEC." The differences you noted are choices (and sometimes compromises) made by the programmer of the NEC or MININ; /archives//html/Antennaware/1998-12/msg00018.html (8,344 bytes)
3. [antennaware] Minninec & Nec2 differences (score: 1): Author: cebik@utkux.utcc.utk.edu (L. B. Cebik); Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1998 08:24:41 -0500 (EST); Pat, The MININEC and NEC cores provide gain figures relative to isotropic for any specified azimuth and zenith angle set. In NEC, the desired pattern request is set via an RP input line or "card." Th; /archives//html/Antennaware/1998-12/msg00020.html (9,308 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]