Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[antennaware\]\s+SWR\s+Calc\s+again\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[antennaware\]\s+SWR\s+Calc\s+again\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [antennaware] SWR Calc again (score: 1): Author: ludal@dmv.com (Dallas Carter); Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 07:49:46 -0400; Thanks to all of those who responded to my initial question. I guess I need to clarify the question. I know that SWR should be Z(load) divided by Z(line) when load is > than line and vice versa, but; /archives//html/Antennaware/1999-08/msg00019.html (7,414 bytes)
2. [antennaware] SWR Calc again (score: 1): Author: p_kirov@tranzit.donetsk.ua (Serge Pozhidaev); Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 18:35:37 +0300; Hi Dallas. No, these formulas are incorrect. It's little longer :-) 1+SQRT(SQR(R-Z)+SQR(X))/SQRT(SQR(R+Z)+SQR(X)) SWR = -- 1-SQRT(SQR(R+Z)+SQR(X))/SQRT(SQR(R-Z)+SQR(X)) where R and X is antenna resis; /archives//html/Antennaware/1999-08/msg00021.html (8,898 bytes)
3. [antennaware] SWR Calc again (score: 1): Author: scace@uu.net (Eric Scace); Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 14:03:23 -0400; And, on the practical side, serious impedance mismatches can also generate voltages above the tolerance of the cable/connectors/insulators. -- Eric K3NA Hi Dallas. have formula does not is a simple N; /archives//html/Antennaware/1999-08/msg00022.html (9,556 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]