Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[antennaware\]\s+discussion\s+with\s+Gary\s+Breed\s+on\s+coax\s+losses\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[antennaware\]\s+discussion\s+with\s+Gary\s+Breed\s+on\s+coax\s+losses\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [antennaware] discussion with Gary Breed on coax losses (score: 1): Author: billydeanward@hotmail.com (Billy Ward); Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 04:58:03 -0000; Hello Gary, I see what you are saying and I see that there is validity to it. I do not mean to sound arrogant, but in 35 years of discussing this type of thing, this is the first time that I have dou; /archives//html/Antennaware/2000-12/msg00012.html (11,296 bytes)
2. [antennaware] discussion with Gary Breed on coax losses (score: 1): Author: gary@noblepub.com (Gary Breed); Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 11:35:52 -0500; Billy Here's the simplest example I could come up with -- Case 1. 72 ohm matched system, one feedline. 100 watts is delivered to the line, which has losses that we will say are equivalent to 10 ohms; /archives//html/Antennaware/2000-12/msg00014.html (7,450 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]