Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+9\.92\.001\s+keying\s+\&\s+cty\.dat\s+corrections\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] 9.92.001 keying & cty.dat corrections (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 19:06:27 -0500
I normally never use the latest rev software but decided to since the latest version supports Orion. I seemed to have a strange keying problem when using CT's keyer on the LPT port to Orion. When I w
/archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00000.html (6,965 bytes)

2. Re: [ct-user] 9.92.001 keying & cty.dat corrections (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 22:46:57 -0500
At 07:06 PM 12/1/2003, Bill Tippett wrote: HL0KSJ is logged as Korea but should be S. Shetlands. VP8/LZ2UU is logged as Falklands but should also be S. Shetlands. I notified AD1C but you may want to
/archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00001.html (8,270 bytes)

3. Re: [ct-user] 9.92.001 keying & cty.dat corrections (score: 1)
Author: "Jim White, K4OJ" <k4oj@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 18:40:49 -0500
lemme ask this - if I deleted a previous response to this one, sorry.... For the TO4E and TO4WW operations is the correct "patch" TO4E=FR/G and TO4WW=FR/G? Thanks, Jim, K4OJ Team W1CW Jim Reisert AD1
/archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00002.html (8,138 bytes)

4. Re: [ct-user] 9.92.001 keying & cty.dat corrections (score: 1)
Author: "G3RIRrsgb" <g3rir@thersgb.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 07:29:12 -0000
Surely they (TO4WW and TO4E) are FR/J not G. Neil, G3RIR _______________________________________________ CT-User mailing list CT-User@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/ct-us
/archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00003.html (9,558 bytes)

5. Re: [ct-user] 9.92.001 keying & cty.dat corrections (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 07:35:48 -0000
According to the DXCC check sheet at ARRL web site: FR/J, E Juan de Nova, Europa AF 53 39 NOT FR/G MAL N7MAL BULLHEAD CITY, AZ www.citlink.net/~suzyq/N7mal.htm www.geocities.com/n7mal lemme ask this
/archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00004.html (8,910 bytes)

6. Re: [ct-user] 9.92.001 keying & cty.dat corrections (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 07:33:27 -0500
K4OJ: TO4WW=FR/G? Jim's latest update (November 18) before the contest included both TO4's correctly as FR/J. You should add downloading the latest cty.dat update to your list of things to do in prep
/archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00005.html (7,883 bytes)

7. Re: [ct-user] 9.92.001 keying & cty.dat corrections (score: 1)
Author: "Stuart Santelmann KC1F" <kc1f@adelphia.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 12:56:41 -0000
will Actually, I saw the same or a similar problem with the keying speed in 9.92. I think it was caused when I used Alt-V, or F9/F10 in the middle of an exchange, and the key speed dropped a lot in
/archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00006.html (8,276 bytes)

8. Re: [ct-user] 9.92.001 keying & cty.dat corrections (score: 1)
Author: "Dallas and Lucy" <ludal@dmv.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 09:53:29 -0500
It is interesting to note that HL0KSJ was actually sending HL0KS1 That's the we we logged it on multiple bands with a note that it was either HL0KSJ, HL0KS1 or HL0KS/1. Any thoughts on how this shoul
/archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00008.html (9,783 bytes)

9. Re: [ct-user] 9.92.001 keying & cty.dat corrections (score: 1)
Author: "wo2n" <wo2n@att.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 18:22:07 -0500
I was using 991 couldn't type in 992 key board locked up on first page name and call. I think if I used ++ and -- in hot keys my 32 wpm would race away. I had to keep setting it back to 32 wpm (altV)
/archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00009.html (9,793 bytes)

10. Re: [ct-user] 9.92.001 keying & cty.dat corrections (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 19:15:29 -0500
At 06:22 PM 12/2/03, WO2N wrote: I was using 991 I think if I used ++ and -- in hot keys my 32 wpm would race away. I had to keep setting it back to 32 wpm (altV) I finally cleared the varied speed i
/archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00011.html (10,677 bytes)

11. Re: [ct-user] 9.92.001 keying & cty.dat corrections (score: 1)
Author: Doug Renwick <VE5RA@sasktel.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 13:45:58 -0600
In DOS version 9.91 I found a change in the programming such that I had to make sure there were an equal number of + and - otherwise my keyer would slow down or speed up depending on the unbalance. D
/archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00073.html (8,825 bytes)

12. Re: [ct-user] 9.92.001 keying & cty.dat corrections (score: 1)
Author: "wo2n" <wo2n@att.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 18:09:56 -0500
Yes I noticed irregularity in "set "key speeds also....didn't kn abt + & - have to be equal, tnx. Also in earlier versions when the keyboard hot keys were used to send preprogrammed CQ , etc. When yo
/archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00074.html (10,606 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu