- 1. [ct-user] CT & Problems with IBM & Clones (score: 1)
- Author: w5hvv@aeneas.net (Roderick M. Fitz-Randolph) (Roderick M. Fitz-Randolph)
- Date: Thu, 4 Dec 1997 09:41:44 -0600
- No flames, please (I've got an FT-1000MP and have ordered 9.32) but I cannot help but compare the problems seemingly inherent in the modularized software and in the microprocessor architecture of the
- /archives//html/CT-User/1997-12/msg00037.html (9,609 bytes)
- 2. [ct-user] CT & Problems with IBM & Clones (score: 1)
- Author: Howard Brainen" <hb@cpimaging.com (Howard Brainen)
- Date: Thu, 4 Dec 1997 16:09:40 -0800
- On the subject of Macs for ham radio computing: I usually stay out of these Mac vs PC discussions, but as my perspective has changed over the past year I've decided to weigh in on this one. I too com
- /archives//html/CT-User/1997-12/msg00038.html (13,296 bytes)
- 3. [ct-user] CT & Problems with IBM & Clones (score: 1)
- Author: AP2TJ - Tariq <ap2tj@paknet2.ptc.pk> (AP2TJ - Tariq)
- Date: Thu, 04 Dec 97 22:18:36 --0500
- Hi Howard, Welcome aboard. I too (in my humble way) disagree with Microsoft's marketing tactics but thats something for Janet Reno to decide. In the meantime, "If you can't beat 'em" seems to rule. M
- /archives//html/CT-User/1997-12/msg00039.html (7,720 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu