Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+CT\s+9\.39\s+and\s+Band\s+Map\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+CT\s+9\.39\s+and\s+Band\s+Map\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] CT 9.39 and Band Map (score: 1): Author: NB1B@aol.com (NB1B@aol.com); Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 20:52:39 EST; At K1XM MM we used CT 9.39 with no problems at all. The only computer reboots that I can recall where to take care of RFI problems- CT and our Ethernet network performed flawlessly. I see that a numb; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-02/msg00084.html (9,551 bytes)
2. [ct-user] CT 9.39 and Band Map (score: 1): Author: Gilmer, Mike" <mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 09:02:17 -0500; Yes, this describes what appears to be a work-around. But it is only a work-around. I will try this method during ARRL SSB (and before!) Better that it be more intuitive and idiot (me) proof! In gene; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-02/msg00086.html (10,367 bytes)
3. [ct-user] CT 9.39 and Band Map (score: 1): Author: Bruce Lallathin <aa8u@modempool.com> (Bruce Lallathin); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 16:10:55 -0500; == You hit the nail squarely! What may not be so obvious is there are many users of CT out there that got it illegally, a copy of a pal's registered version. Everything but the manual I would say. I; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-02/msg00090.html (9,292 bytes)
4. [ct-user] CT 9.39 and Band Map (score: 1): Author: Dick Green" <dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 16:43:31 -0500; users version. we the had Now hang on just a minute, Bruce. This is a very bad assumption on your part. I paid Harvard Software for my copy of CT back in 1994 and received a copy of the then-current; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-02/msg00091.html (9,666 bytes)
5. [ct-user] CT 9.39 and Band Map (score: 1): Author: Gilmer, Mike" <mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 17:25:55 -0500; In this case, since I'll take credit (or blame) for starting the BandMap issue, I state for the record that I have a legal copy of 9.37 - purchased a few weeks ago. I downloaded 9.39 from the vault.; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-02/msg00093.html (9,264 bytes)
6. [ct-user] CT 9.39 and Band Map (score: 1): Author: Kevin Arber" <karber@smart.net (Kevin Arber); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 17:15:06 -0500; Okay -- there are some bad guys out there. On the other hand I have been a CT user for quite a while, have three manuals -- for different versions that I purchased -- and I don't know everything that; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-02/msg00094.html (10,753 bytes)
7. [ct-user] CT 9.39 and Band Map (score: 1): Author: John D. Allen" <jallen@vhfcom.com (John D. Allen); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 17:21:09 -0500; Furthermore, the index and table of contents are not all encompassing. (Most aren't!) So even if it is in the manual doesn't mean you can easily find it! I don't advocate software piracy, but I certa; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-02/msg00095.html (12,541 bytes)
8. [ct-user] CT 9.39 and Band Map (score: 1): Author: alsopb <alsopb@gloryroad.net> (alsopb); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 22:45:53 +0000; FYI, The band map feature is only partially documented even in legit manuals. My manual for Version 9. It has only info on how to turn on the band map feature. Nothing about arrow keys or even how to; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-02/msg00097.html (10,665 bytes)
9. [ct-user] CT 9.39 and Band Map (score: 1): Author: Glenn R. Johnson" <gjohnson@northernnet.com (Glenn R. Johnson); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 16:47:13 -0600; FB Dennis.....the BandMap works flawlessly with ONE radio, but with a TWO radio set up, the BandMap for RADIO2 does NOT work. In our network, the BandMap works perfectly at each position, except wher; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-02/msg00098.html (11,052 bytes)
10. [ct-user] CT 9.39 and Band Map (score: 1): Author: Robert Doherty <k1vv@tmlp.com> (Robert Doherty); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 18:08:37 -0500; Bruce, we asked some questions about the BANDMAP but we do not have a STOLEN copy of CT... We are a registered user Version 9.33... If you take the time to look at page 51 "BANDMAP"...in the CT 9 man; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-02/msg00099.html (10,739 bytes)
11. Re[2]: [ct-user] CT 9.39 and Band Map (score: 1): Author: RNotarius@chester-engineers.com (Ron Notarius) (Ron Notarius); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 19:01:19 -0500; So what do you propose? I post my SN along with my query? (yeah, sure, THAT's secure.) Or will you settle for a copy of the cancelled check? Or do I have to show you my disks going back to version 6.; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-02/msg00102.html (10,338 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]