- 1. [ct-user] CT 9.90 and WAEDC (score: 1)
- Author: ct at dl6rai.muc.de (Bernhard Buettner)
- Date: Tue Aug 12 16:38:42 2003
- Dear CT users: Can any of you confirm or comment on the following observations of CT 9.90.007 during WAE DX Contest last weekend? We operated Multi-Single from DF0CG using MS-DOS 6.22 and FT-1000D (n
- /archives//html/CT-User/2003-08/msg00037.html (8,634 bytes)
- 2. [ct-user] CT 9.90 and WAEDC (score: 1)
- Author: k1ttt at arrl.net (David Robbins K1TTT)
- Date: Tue Aug 12 17:08:32 2003
- I had a guest op running 9.90, another machine on the network was just making a duplicate log... comments below: Multi-Single Both computers agreed on qtc and score the whole time. both computers kne
- /archives//html/CT-User/2003-08/msg00039.html (9,400 bytes)
- 3. [ct-user] CT 9.90 and WAEDC (score: 1)
- Author: ct at dl6rai.muc.de (Bernhard Buettner)
- Date: Tue Aug 12 17:33:31 2003
- Hi David, Thanks for your quick reply to my message. Well, sending QTCs is not the same as receiving them. I heard from DL1MGB (another Multi-Single station) using 9.89 who reported the same problem.
- /archives//html/CT-User/2003-08/msg00040.html (7,694 bytes)
- 4. [ct-user] CT 9.90 and WAEDC (score: 1)
- Author: dk9ip at gmx.de (Winfried Kriegl)
- Date: Mon Aug 18 17:47:19 2003
- I can confirm points a), b), c). Same thing here as decribed by Ben when running Version 9.90.007 @ DOS 6.22. With Version 9.72 received QTCs are counted correctly at PC #2. Used V9.90 though as 9.72
- /archives//html/CT-User/2003-08/msg00045.html (10,483 bytes)
- 5. [ct-user] CT 9.90 and WAEDC (score: 1)
- Author: ha6nd at dx.hu (ha6nd)
- Date: Wed Aug 20 01:51:37 2003
- HG6N started with version 9.89.002 @ DOS 6.22, which was used during WPX and IARU without serious problem. We used only two computers with serial networking. No radio attached to the computers. I can
- /archives//html/CT-User/2003-08/msg00050.html (7,328 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu