- 1. RE: [ct-user] CT 9.92.001 Slow down, (WAS: CT 9.92.001 andWin95help) (score: 1)
- Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
- Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 14:52:39 -0000
- There are a couple times when you may get delays depending on your computer speed and setup. 1. after the first 2 characters ct tries to update the super check partial window with every character you
- /archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00046.html (9,487 bytes)
- 2. Re: [ct-user] CT 9.92.001 Slow down, (WAS: CT 9.92.001 andWin95help) (score: 1)
- Author: Wilbert Knol <w.knol@niwa.co.nz>
- Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 09:20:58 +1300
- Minimal hassles with DOS CT 9.92-001 in the ARRL 10 m. This is on a single PC, logged on to Packet Cluster. No network. Only one comment: CT stopped responding to keystrokes at one point Although the
- /archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00050.html (9,738 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu