Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+CT\s+9\.92\.001\s+Slow\s+down\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+CT\s+9\.92\.001\s+Slow\s+down\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] CT 9.92.001 Slow down (score: 1): Author: "IZ4EFN Alessio" <iz4efn@libero.it>; Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 18:57:43 +0100; That's wonderful...this topic finally discussed also on the reflector! We experience some CTWIN slow down since we turned to ctwin 3 releases ago. At IO4T we used the following setup for the test: 73; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00049.html (7,653 bytes)
2. Re: [ct-user] CT 9.92.001 Slow down (score: 1): Author: "Patrick 9A5AEI" <patrick@rkp.ice.hr>; Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 21:28:22 +0100; Hello CTwin and DOS users! I noticed the same problem when i use CTWin in Win98... this happens when you enable master.dat window and when u try to use mouse... Also u can not move windows how u like; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00051.html (7,757 bytes)
3. Re: [ct-user] CT 9.92.001 Slow down (score: 1): Author: Hank Kohl K8DD <k8dd@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 14:48:00 -0500; At 12/16/2003 03:28 PM, Patrick 9A5AEI wrote: So guys buy faster machines and install WinXP or use CT for DOS in real DOS mode! :) 73 de 9A5AEI, 9A1P, 9A7P CONTEST TEAM Although Win98SE and Win2kPro; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00052.html (7,402 bytes)
4. Re: [ct-user] CT 9.92.001 Slow down (score: 1): Author: "John Bednar" <k3ct@fast.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 18:58:58 -0500; I have noticed that the later versions of CTWin are slower also. My desktop contest computer is a 266 MHz Pentium, 256meg ram, Win98SE, and telnet spots. I operate with only CTWin running with the ba; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00053.html (7,379 bytes)
5. Re: [ct-user] CT 9.92.001 Slow down (score: 1): Author: K4SB <k4sb@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 04:08:11 +0000; This is common. You simply cannot run Windows with that amount of memory, especially when you consider you must keep your networking status. As an example, my shack machine is a PIII @ 400 mHz. Dual; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00054.html (8,413 bytes)
6. Re: [ct-user] CT 9.92.001 Slow down (score: 1): Author: K4SB <k4sb@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 04:20:53 +0000; I just made a post on memory, but the faster processor is simply not needed. Think about it, you have a machine capable of making 133,000,000 calculations per second. But, it can't run on 16 mb of m; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00055.html (8,440 bytes)
7. Re: [ct-user] CT 9.92.001 Slow down (score: 1): Author: Serge Vaskovsky US4LGW <us4lgw@ukrpost.net>; Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 13:18:27 +0300; Well, Gentlemen The final results of our discussions are : - upgrade computer to use CT 9.92.xxx with its all features (DOS or Win, it doesn't matter)to (min) P-II 400 MHz, 128 Mb RAM; - use an older; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00056.html (8,264 bytes)
8. Re: [ct-user] CT 9.92.001 Slow down (score: 1): Author: "Patrick 9A5AEI" <patrick@rkp.ice.hr>; Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 12:28:46 +0100; Hello, i think that for CT DOS u can use DX2-486 with 8 Mb RAM... that is enough! Here for CTwin i am using P2 - celeron 400MHz/96Mb RAM on win98. Its a little bit slow but works, CW keying on LPT an; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00057.html (9,596 bytes)
9. Re: [ct-user] CT 9.92.001 Slow down (score: 1): Author: k1ttt@arrl.net; Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 06:45:15 -0500 (EST); ct dos 9.92 runs just fine (after reducing the size of the bandmap in big contests) on 386dx 25mhz with 5 meg of ram. if you are running pure dos 6.22 then you don't have to worry about windows memo; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00058.html (7,887 bytes)
10. Re: [ct-user] CT 9.92.001 Slow down (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 08:45:20 -0500; My personal recommendations for memory: Win95/98 - 128MB or more WinNT/2K - 256MB or more WinXP - 512MB or more I am looking at my WinXP PC right now with 512MB of RAM. I am running only DX4WIN, Eudo; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00059.html (8,787 bytes)
11. Re: [ct-user] CT 9.92.001 Slow down (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 10:49:20 -0500; Wow...had not looked at this reflector recently and see quite a discussion about the "slow down". Previously I noted a problem with 9.92.001 and CW speed up (+++) and slow down (--) in F1-4, as well; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00061.html (8,243 bytes)
12. Re: [ct-user] CT 9.92.001 Slow down (score: 1): Author: K4SB <k4sb@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:37:22 +0000; -- Jim is right on the button. But, when I ordered 512 MB of memory from Tigerdirect.com, they mentioned memory prices are going UP. No reason given... As for those older shorter memory chips, I hav; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00063.html (8,853 bytes)
13. RE: [ct-user] CT 9.92.001 Slow down (score: 1): Author: "N2TK" <tony.kaz@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 12:10:38 -0500; The reason memory is going up is simple - supply and demand. The "fabs", instead or running at 30-50% capacity as they did several months ago, are operating up around 80-95% capacity. Lead times are; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00065.html (10,069 bytes)
14. Re: [ct-user] CT 9.92.001 Slow down (score: 1): Author: "Yuri Onipko" <va3uz@rac.ca>; Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 13:39:28 -0500; I upgraded to 9.92 DOS "during" the ARRL 10 m Contest and noticed same problem. Had 9.80 before and it worked fine. Yuri VE3DZ _______________________________________________ CT-User mailing list CT-; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00070.html (9,400 bytes)
15. Re: [ct-user] CT 9.92.001 Slow down (score: 1): Author: "Patrick 9A5AEI" <patrick@rkp.ice.hr>; Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 20:27:34 +0100; Hello, agn :) By the way DOS6.20 or 6.22 can see only 64Mb of your RAM installed! U may have also 1GB u will see only 64Mb of ram, for DOS that is more than enough! 73 _______________________________; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00072.html (8,299 bytes)
16. Re: [ct-user] CT 9.92.001 Slow down (score: 1): Author: Serge Vaskovsky US4LGW <us4lgw@ukrpost.net>; Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 10:44:50 +0300; So, should we upgrade our old 233 MHz PC's for using CTWin while other more complex programs like Adobe Photoshop or Corel Draw running quite good on 233 MHz 32 RAM ? Ken, what is your opinion? -- Be; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-12/msg00088.html (8,301 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]