Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+CT9\.90\.005\s+Still\s+Broken\s+for\s+JUNE\s+VHF\s+Tst\s+above\s+3\.4Ghz\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+CT9\.90\.005\s+Still\s+Broken\s+for\s+JUNE\s+VHF\s+Tst\s+above\s+3\.4Ghz\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] CT9.90.005 Still Broken for JUNE VHF Tst above 3.4Ghz (score: 1): Author: k1vu at tmlp.com (R Johnson); Date: Sat May 31 17:38:13 2003; ALT-F1/ALT-F2 not working properly. Can't use ALT-F2 to wrap from LHT to 50Mhz, you have to use ALT-F1 and step all the ways down thru the bands. ALL QSO's above 3.4Ghz log as 3.4Ghz and as a dupe if; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-05/msg00081.html (7,387 bytes)
2. [ct-user] CT9.90.005 Still Broken for JUNE VHF Tst above 3.4Ghz (score: 1): Author: chris at bergenscanner.com (Chris Allermann - W2CWA); Date: Sat May 31 18:17:33 2003; As things stand now...what would be the recommended version for the June VHF test? Chris - W2CWA; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-05/msg00082.html (8,208 bytes)
3. [ct-user] CT9.90.005 Still Broken for JUNE VHF Tst above 3.4Ghz (score: 1): Author: rjohnson at tmlp.com (Bob Johnson); Date: Sat May 31 18:55:06 2003; CT9.81 is what I'm planing on using unless Ken is able to get CT9.90 fixed in time for the contest.? I had to use 9.81 for Jan !!! 73 es GL Bob, K1VU 50Mhz, <http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listi; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-05/msg00083.html (9,060 bytes)
4. [ct-user] CT9.90.005 Still Broken for JUNE VHF Tst above 3.4Ghz (score: 1): Author: jjreisert at alum.mit.edu (Jim Reisert AD1C); Date: Sat May 31 21:13:25 2003; These are all due to Ken's radio control changes. I remember discussing with him what a pain the VHF bands are. I think if you type in the frequency (i.e. 5760) CT will QSO to the right band. 73 - Ji; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-05/msg00084.html (7,407 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]