Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+Cabrillo\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+Cabrillo\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] Cabrillo (score: 1): Author: hwbrown@intercape.com (Henry Brown); Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 05:06:52 -0500; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0014_01C1C595.E4D13780 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I am using CT v.9.67. A; /archives//html/CT-User/2002-03/msg00032.html (8,298 bytes)
2. [ct-user] Cabrillo (score: 1): Author: hwbrown@intercape.com (Henry Brown); Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 05:34:53 -0500; You are correct, sir. Problem solved. Henry K1WCC; /archives//html/CT-User/2002-03/msg00033.html (7,489 bytes)
3. [ct-user] CABRILLO (score: 1): Author: n7mal@ctaz.com (N7MAL); Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 16:57:38 -0000; Can someone explain, preferably AD1C or K1EA, why CT generates 2 similar files, .LOG & .TXT ? It seems to my simple mind all this confusion about which file to send could be eliminated if only one fi; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-12/msg00023.html (7,463 bytes)
4. [ct-user] CABRILLO (score: 1): Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG); Date: 9 Dec 2001 11:36:49 -0800; Actually, the files are not all that similar. The "wrong" one has no summary info at the start. One is the old ARRL format (a somewhat predecessor to Cabrillo). Certainly it is no longer really neede; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-12/msg00025.html (8,587 bytes)
5. [ct-user] CABRILLO (score: 1): Author: balister@vt.edu (Philip Balister); Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 14:46:15 -0500; The old one is handy if you want a human readable copy of the log. 73 de Philip, K4EP; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-12/msg00026.html (9,420 bytes)
6. [ct-user] CABRILLO (score: 1): Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG); Date: 9 Dec 2001 11:48:14 -0800; Cabrillo is perfectly human readable - that's one of its virutes. It just has some header info at the top. Great for documenting just what the log is for. ____________________________________________; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-12/msg00027.html (10,078 bytes)
7. [ct-user] CABRILLO (score: 1): Author: jjreisert@alum.mit.edu (Jim Reisert); Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2001 16:51:50 -0500; Hard to break old habits? I don't know for sure if ALL the contest sponsors that CT can log all support receiving Cabrillo-formatted logs. There may be some marginal value in writing two different lo; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-12/msg00032.html (7,863 bytes)
8. [ct-user] CABRILLO (score: 1): Author: k6acz@earthlink.net (Alan C. Zack); Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2001 13:52:59 -0800; I like to use the .log file to import to excel. After it is a excel file you can do sorts to change the way the data is listed. For example you can do a sort by call sign, then you will have all the; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-12/msg00033.html (10,144 bytes)
9. [ct-user] CABRILLO (score: 1): Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG); Date: 9 Dec 2001 17:40:14 -0800; The Cabrillo log is certainly suitable for that. Anyone can do a "cut" of the first few lines (summary); Excel even allows any number of initial lines to be left out of any import. Mike N2MG ________; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-12/msg00036.html (11,359 bytes)
10. [ct-user] CABRILLO (score: 1): Author: kwolff@charter.net (Ken Wolff); Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 17:28:38 -0500; For along time third party software has been using the old ARRL format named <callsign>.log to read CT logs. Rather than break all that software, I used <callsign>.txt as Cabrillo output because the; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-12/msg00047.html (8,809 bytes)
11. [ct-user] CABRILLO (score: 1): Author: n7mal@ctaz.com (N7MAL); Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 23:37:25 -0000; Thanks Ken for the reply. You provide 2 utilities, C2A & B2R which should meet anyone's requirement for whatever they want to do post-contest. I think it's about time for some standards and now we ha; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-12/msg00048.html (10,498 bytes)
12. [ct-user] CABRILLO (score: 1): Author: n7mal@ctaz.com (N7MAL); Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 23:43:47 -0000; Thanks Ken for the reply. You provide 2 utilities, C2A & B2R which should meet anyone's requirement for whatever they want to do post-contest. I think it's about time for some standards and now we ha; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-12/msg00049.html (10,217 bytes)
13. [ct-user] cabrillo (score: 1): Author: David Robbins <k1ttt@berkshire.net> (David Robbins); Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2000 22:51:35 +0000; does this look right for ss??? where do operators for multi-ops get listed? there is no place to enter them in ct, normally i just edit the summary and put them there, does that have to be done in ca; /archives//html/CT-User/2000-11/msg00070.html (7,862 bytes)
14. [ct-user] cabrillo (score: 1): Author: Dan Karg" <dkarg@mn.mediaone.net (Dan Karg); Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 02:37:37 -0000; I've just been reading the spec: Operators would be: "OPERATORS: callsign1 [callsign2 callsign3...] A space-delimited list of operator callsign(s). " Like: OPERATORS: K1TTT K1ABC K3UU K5AA You can ha; /archives//html/CT-User/2000-11/msg00071.html (8,884 bytes)
15. [ct-user] Cabrillo (score: 1): Author: David J. Strout" <djsatty@home.com (David J. Strout); Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 15:10:01 +0000; I don't want to leave out any of the call signs of the operators during a multi operation in SS Phone. In editing W2YC.txt (Cabrillo file), where do I insert the calls of the other operators so that; /archives//html/CT-User/2000-11/msg00120.html (7,140 bytes)
16. [ct-user] Cabrillo (score: 1): Author: Doug Brandon <dab@home.com> (Doug Brandon); Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 10:15:00 -0800; Add a line that says "OPERATORS:" followed by a space delimited list of operators. example: OPERATORS: W2YC W1ABC W2XYZ K2XXX CT should probably include this blank tag by default, but the operator st; /archives//html/CT-User/2000-11/msg00127.html (7,527 bytes)
17. [ct-user] Cabrillo (score: 1): Author: Ben Fisher <k9bf@uiuc.edu>; Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:52:29 -0500; Ok I did the writelog command but it did not generate a .log file Which file is the cabrillo? Ben Fisher EE University of Illinois School of Chemical Sciences Electronics Services ___________________; /archives//html/CT-User/2008-10/msg00020.html (6,354 bytes)
18. Re: [ct-user] Cabrillo (score: 1): Author: Tim Groat <tcgroat@mesanetworks.net>; Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 21:59:28 -0600; Look in the directory where CT is installed. I keep my logs in different directories (CT\CQWW, CT\SS, CT\VHF, etc), but the cabrillo .log file always is written to the same folder as the CT executabl; /archives//html/CT-User/2008-10/msg00028.html (7,085 bytes)
19. Re: [ct-user] Cabrillo (score: 1): Author: Dave Lee Boland <dlboland@embarqmail.com>; Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 09:51:58 -0400 (EDT); Since I helped get this started. When I attachec the "W9NWY" text file into the email to CQWW it loaded as "W9NWY.log" without me changing the name on the file. Looks like I helped make a mountain th; /archives//html/CT-User/2008-10/msg00029.html (7,135 bytes)
20. Re: [ct-user] Cabrillo (score: 1): Author: "Robert Naumann" <w5ov@w5ov.com>; Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:57:46 -0500; This is probably due to the settings in your operating systems not showing the .LOG file extension. You can change this so you can see all file extensions. I think it is through "folder options" or s; /archives//html/CT-User/2008-10/msg00030.html (8,191 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]