Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+Cabrillo\s+and\s+Soapbox\s+Comments\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+Cabrillo\s+and\s+Soapbox\s+Comments\?\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] Cabrillo and Soapbox Comments? (score: 1): Author: Geovincent@aol.com (Geovincent@aol.com); Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 10:04:42 EST; November SS 2000 rules 2.4.2 states Times off and on must be clearly noted in paper logs. They should be listed separately in the "Soapbox/Comments" section of an electronic Cabrillo file submission.; /archives//html/CT-User/2000-11/msg00119.html (8,168 bytes)
2. [ct-user] Cabrillo and Soapbox Comments? (score: 1): Author: Tom Carrubba KA2D" <ka2d@arrl.net (Tom Carrubba KA2D); Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 11:59:08 -0500; FYI, The following URL has the format for adding comments and operators http://www.kkn.net/~trey/cabrillo/spec.html 73 -Tom KA2D listed file a -- WWW: http://www.k1ea.com/ Submissions: ct-user@contes; /archives//html/CT-User/2000-11/msg00124.html (9,229 bytes)
3. [ct-user] Cabrillo and Soapbox Comments? (score: 1): Author: Nate Bargmann <n0nb@networksplus.net> (Nate Bargmann); Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 13:14:02 -0600; Here is an excerpt from the confirmation email I received from ARRL after submitting my SSCW log: "Time-on and time-off reporting is not required for logs submitted in the Cabrillo format. This messa; /archives//html/CT-User/2000-11/msg00128.html (9,419 bytes)
4. [ct-user] Cabrillo and Soapbox Comments? (score: 1): Author: Jim Pratt" <n6ig@hotmail.com (Jim Pratt); Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 19:23:40 GMT; Actually, based on the Cabrillo logs (and us not being required to state offtimes), HQ can NOT properly determine breaks. Computer logging programs determine times off as the time elapsed between two; /archives//html/CT-User/2000-11/msg00129.html (9,051 bytes)
5. [ct-user] Cabrillo and Soapbox Comments? (score: 1): Author: Nate Bargmann <n0nb@networksplus.net> (Nate Bargmann); Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 16:08:26 -0600; AFAIK, this is a matter you'll need to take up with n1nd@arrl.org I simply relayed text from the auto-responder that is quoted above. Apparently, ARRL has decided on some method of calculating ON/OFF; /archives//html/CT-User/2000-11/msg00135.html (10,507 bytes)
6. [ct-user] Cabrillo and Soapbox Comments? (score: 1): Author: Kz2i@aol.com (Kz2i@aol.com); Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 20:04:06 EST; all you have to do is go to www.arrl.org. find the contest rule section. it is right there, saying that no on/off is needed with cabrillo. -- WWW: http://www.k1ea.com/ Submissions: ct-user@contesting; /archives//html/CT-User/2000-11/msg00138.html (7,805 bytes)
7. [ct-user] Cabrillo and Soapbox Comments? (score: 1): Author: Nate Bargmann <n0nb@networksplus.net> (Nate Bargmann); Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 19:30:55 -0600; That's not in dispute. However, when you submit your log via email I bet you receive the same text in the confirmation email as I did Saturday stating that manually listing on/off times when submitti; /archives//html/CT-User/2000-11/msg00139.html (9,941 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]