Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+Doubt\s+in\s+multi\-op\s+operations\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+Doubt\s+in\s+multi\-op\s+operations\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] Doubt in multi-op operations (score: 1): Author: Fidel Leon" <sac40@dimoni.com (Fidel Leon); Date: Mon, 07 Sep 1998 16:40:05 +0200; [Since it looked like too many people were in holidays when I put that message, I repost it again. Sorry for any inconvenience!]. I have a doubt with multi-op operations in SSB Contests where you mus; /archives//html/CT-User/1998-09/msg00011.html (7,665 bytes)
2. [ct-user] Doubt in multi-op operations (score: 1): Author: David Robbins <k1ttt@berkshire.net> (David Robbins); Date: Mon, 07 Sep 1998 15:55:45 +0000; using ct in m/s contests with networked computers with single sets of serial numbers is not easy. you have to be very careful of the sequence of operations to avoid messing up the serial numbers. its; /archives//html/CT-User/1998-09/msg00012.html (9,386 bytes)
3. [ct-user] Doubt in multi-op operations (score: 1): Author: Fidel Leon" <sac40@dimoni.com (Fidel Leon); Date: Tue, 04 Aug 1998 12:04:54 +0200; I have a doubt with multi-op operations, in contest where you must give a serial number. What is th right CT operation mode to avoid giving each operator the same serial number CT indicates in each o; /archives//html/CT-User/1998-08/msg00003.html (7,890 bytes)
4. [ct-user] Doubt in multi-op operations (score: 1): Author: Gary Yantis <gyantis@midtec.com> (Gary Yantis); Date: Tue, 4 Aug 1998 09:15:26 -0600; Fidel -- Put the # sign in the exchange key (shift F2) as part of the exchange. For example "5NN#" will send 5NN and the serial number when you hit the F2 key. If you have two (or more) computers and; /archives//html/CT-User/1998-08/msg00007.html (7,891 bytes)
5. [ct-user] Doubt in multi-op operations (score: 1): Author: Fidel Leon" <sac40@dimoni.com (Fidel Leon); Date: Wed, 05 Aug 1998 02:52:20 +0200; I forgot to say I saw the trouble in WPX SSB O:-) What should the operators do in SSB contests (and not using DVP)? Tnx fer advice! Fidel Leon - EA3GIP sac40@dimoni.com -- Submissions: ct-user@contes; /archives//html/CT-User/1998-08/msg00008.html (7,659 bytes)
6. [ct-user] Doubt in multi-op operations (score: 1): Author: Jim Pratt <n6ig@netcom.com> (Jim Pratt); Date: Wed, 5 Aug 1998 08:36:07 -0700 (PDT); Sorry, this isn't true. If you have LOGGED the QSO on one computer, the other computer won't send the same serial number. But if both are starting a QSO at the same time, they WILL send the same seri; /archives//html/CT-User/1998-08/msg00011.html (8,542 bytes)
7. [ct-user] Doubt in multi-op operations (score: 1): Author: Fidel Leon" <sac40@dimoni.com (Fidel Leon); Date: Thu, 06 Aug 1998 11:34:13 +0200; ** REPLY SEPARATOR ** Just that! Beginning of contest, the two operators making their firsts QSOs, the two DX stations received serial 001. ... and just the work-around we used.... It would make the; /archives//html/CT-User/1998-08/msg00014.html (8,532 bytes)
8. [ct-user] Doubt in multi-op operations (score: 1): Author: Fidel Leon" <sac40@dimoni.com (Fidel Leon); Date: Thu, 06 Aug 1998 15:13:38 +0200; ** REPLY SEPARATOR ** I'm afraid it isn't the solution at all.... Actually, the two computers were networked OK. The trouble is: when the two computers are networked, both operators see as available; /archives//html/CT-User/1998-08/msg00015.html (8,241 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]