Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+FW\:\s+Does\s+CT\s+support\s+M2\s+in\s+WPX\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+FW\:\s+Does\s+CT\s+support\s+M2\s+in\s+WPX\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] FW: Does CT support M2 in WPX? (score: 1): Author: PhilHSS at Breathemail.net (Phil); Date: Tue Mar 4 04:59:42 2003; Well, I've not heard from anyone on this aspect, so I am rather guessing that either I've got it all terribly wrong and the software does indeed perform correctly for M2 in WPX (in which case could s; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-03/msg00009.html (7,988 bytes)
2. [ct-user] FW: Does CT support M2 in WPX? (score: 1): Author: kh6nd at lava.net (kh6nd@lava.net); Date: Wed Mar 5 23:45:06 2003; Phil, I second the motion for support of M2 in the upcoming WPX. I am also wondering if it would be possible to have one of the two stations set up with two radios and an Array Solutions SO2R master.; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-03/msg00031.html (9,322 bytes)
3. [ct-user] FW: Does CT support M2 in WPX? (score: 1): Author: jjreisert at alum.mit.edu (Jim Reisert AD1C); Date: Thu Mar 6 07:52:38 2003; Ken already has a test version which has received one rave review. When he gets the rest of his planned bug fixes done later this week, he'll release 9.88. 73 - Jim AD1C -- Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charle; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-03/msg00032.html (7,293 bytes)
4. [ct-user] FW: Does CT support M2 in WPX? (score: 1): Author: kwolff at charter.net (Ken Wolff); Date: Thu Mar 6 10:22:10 2003; You can use two radios per computer with CT988 as it is with no trouble, if you don't mind keeping track of the band changes yourself. I hope to have that incorporated before the SSB WPX, but no guar; /archives//html/CT-User/2003-03/msg00033.html (10,078 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]