Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+Field\s+Day\s+Success\!\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+Field\s+Day\s+Success\!\!\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] Field Day Success!! (score: 1): Author: William R Liporace NA2NA <kb2hun@wizvax.net> (William R Liporace NA2NA); Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 20:07:19 -0400 (EDT); I have heard and seen many people bitch about CT and the dependability or support! I have got to tell you 9.63 was almost flawless at the K2CT sit this past weekend. We had 7 PCs networked together w; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-06/msg00078.html (8,126 bytes)
2. [ct-user] Field Day Success!! (score: 1): Author: Nate Bargmann <n0nb@networksplus.net> (Nate Bargmann); Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 19:23:08 -0500; I must add that 9.63 was solid for us as well. We ran 1A with one computer, so we didn't use too many features, just logging and CW keying. We did have one "strange" happen. This morning I was asked; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-06/msg00079.html (8,513 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]