Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+Mapping\s+of\s+PJ7\/ND5S\s+and\s+FS\/ND5S\s+in\s+CT\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+Mapping\s+of\s+PJ7\/ND5S\s+and\s+FS\/ND5S\s+in\s+CT\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] Mapping of PJ7/ND5S and FS/ND5S in CT (score: 1): Author: N2TK" <n2tk@earthlink.net (N2TK); Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 19:47:19 -0500; Trying to figure out how to map these calls to get credit for separate mults. I tried full call mapping, but the program treats "ND5S" as the defining part of the call. How did others treat this situ; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-02/msg00025.html (8,192 bytes)
2. [ct-user] Mapping of PJ7/ND5S and FS/ND5S in CT (score: 1): Author: Bill Hider" <n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider); Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 04:44:08 -0000; I wondered the same thing, but during the contest it appeared that multiplier credit was given. After the contest, I looked at the .ALL file, I see that both FJ and PJ7 multiplier credit was given fo; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-02/msg00027.html (9,319 bytes)
3. [ct-user] Mapping of PJ7/ND5S and FS/ND5S in CT (score: 1): Author: Tyler Stewart" <k3mm@erols.com (Tyler Stewart); Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 06:30:41 -0000; CT counted the multiplier OK, but came up with dupes for the second round of QSO's with ND5S. How to fix this is the only question. file, calls -- WWW: http://www.k1ea.com/ Submissions: ct-user@conte; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-02/msg00028.html (10,469 bytes)
4. [ct-user] Mapping of PJ7/ND5S and FS/ND5S in CT (score: 1): Author: Bill Hider" <n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider); Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 06:48:36 -0000; I changed a "DUPE" entry from PJ7/ND5S to PJ7/ND5S/PJ7 in the CT log entry and the DUPE disappeared and the multiplier credit was given. I tried changing it to ND5S/PJ7, but that, too, resulted in a; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-02/msg00029.html (8,726 bytes)
5. [ct-user] Mapping of PJ7/ND5S and FS/ND5S in CT (score: 1): Author: Jim Pratt" <n6ig@hotmail.com (Jim Pratt); Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 06:51:19 -0000; I logged the second call as "PJ7/ND5S/P" and it credited both points and mult OK. I will delete the "/P" from the Cabrillo printout before sending to the league. Not an elegant solution, but it IS a; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-02/msg00030.html (8,391 bytes)
6. [ct-user] Mapping of PJ7/ND5S and FS/ND5S in CT (score: 1): Author: Ed K1EP <k1ep@arrl.net> (Ed K1EP); Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 07:19:05 -0500; Does it make a difference, as long as the official scorers (ARRL) score it properly? The Cabrillo log doesn't show dupes. -- WWW: http://www.k1ea.com/ Submissions: ct-user@contesting.com Administrati; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-02/msg00031.html (8,331 bytes)
7. [ct-user] Mapping of PJ7/ND5S and FS/ND5S in CT (score: 1): Author: Mike Gilmer - N2MG <n2mg@contesting.com> (Mike Gilmer - N2MG); Date: 20 Feb 2001 05:01:33 -0800; I agree with Ed. This is all pretty moot. The log checking process will not only take care of dupes (or non-dupes) with NO PENALTY, it will also take care of multipliers. Of course, it'd be nice if t; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-02/msg00032.html (9,353 bytes)
8. [ct-user] Mapping of PJ7/ND5S and FS/ND5S in CT (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C" <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu (Jim Reisert AD1C); Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 18:58:40 -0500; There is no need to worry about the duping of the calls. CT will export QSO data into the Cabrillo log without any indication of dupes. 73 - Jim AD1C -- Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Ch; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-02/msg00054.html (8,542 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]