- 1. [ct-user] More on CT 9.3x and ICOM radio control (score: 1)
- Author: Steve Lund <wa8lly@pacbell.net> (Steve Lund)
- Date: Wed, 03 Mar 1999 19:01:30 -0800
- Had some time today to download various versions of CT 9.3x from the vault to test out the ICOM radio control problems. I'm using an IC-735 on COM3. My testing was done with CQ WPX CW as the contest.
- /archives//html/CT-User/1999-03/msg00003.html (8,520 bytes)
- 2. [ct-user] More on CT 9.3x and ICOM radio control (score: 1)
- Author: Mike Walker <mwalker@Legato.COM> (Mike Walker)
- Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 08:48:05 -0500
- Steve We used CT9.38 for the RAC Canada Winter Contest in a M/M setup with an Ethernet Network and it worked fine on an IC-756. I know that this doesn't help, but thought you would like to know. I wi
- /archives//html/CT-User/1999-03/msg00004.html (7,644 bytes)
- 3. [ct-user] More on CT 9.3x and ICOM radio control (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu> (Jim Reisert AD1C)
- Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 09:12:37 -0500
- Well, I could not get my 756 to work properly with 9.39 or 9.38 in the ARRL DX CW. CT just would NOT read the frequency from the radio. I had to run 9.37 in the KC1XX M/M setup (COM port networking).
- /archives//html/CT-User/1999-03/msg00005.html (8,252 bytes)
- 4. [ct-user] More on CT 9.3x and ICOM radio control (score: 1)
- Author: Fred Hopengarten <k1vr@juno.com> (Fred Hopengarten)
- Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 09:38:58 EST
- K1VR: Before giving up all hope and going back to 8.53, try 9.27, which is robust. -- Submissions: ct-user@contesting.com Administrative requests: ct-user-REQUEST@contesting.com WWW: http://www.conte
- /archives//html/CT-User/1999-03/msg00007.html (7,501 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu