Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+Network\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+Network\s+question\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] Network question (score: 1): Author: n3rd@ix.netcom.com (Dave Hawes); Date: Sat, 3 Aug 1996 18:26:22 -0400; OK, you guys with CT network experience, a question for you. First some background. At the N3RS multi_single/multi_two station, we have always used three wire null modem cables on the serial network.; /archives//html/CT-User/1996-08/msg00004.html (8,471 bytes)
2. [ct-user] Network question (score: 1): Author: cady@mainman.ee.montana.edu (Fred Cady); Date: Sat, 3 Aug 1996 14:18:04 -0600; Hi Dave, I'm pretty sure that when I was corresponding with Ken about the -loop option that he told me that the software does not use any of the RTS/CTS flow control so hooking those signal up and ma; /archives//html/CT-User/1996-08/msg00005.html (7,623 bytes)
3. [ct-user] Network question (score: 1): Author: kr2j@ix.netcom.com (Robert E. Naumann); Date: Sun, 4 Aug 1996 06:19:35 -0500; Hi Dave; Based on our experiences at N2RM, the best way to hook up a network for CT is by utilizing all available hardware handshaking and also using the -LOOP method. Warren Walsh, N2BCC, (WWALSH@in; /archives//html/CT-User/1996-08/msg00006.html (7,371 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]