Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+New\s+Super\s+Check\s+Partial\s+Files\s+Available\s+VER20050905\s+\(5\s+Sep05\)\s*$/: 3571 ]

Total 3571 documents matching your query.

281. [NA-User] LPT1 interface problem on new computer (score: 1)
Author: steve@oakcom.com (Steve Maki)
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 12:19:28 -0400
Problem: Swapped in a new computer, and now I can't key the radio unless I unplug the PTT line. Problem is the same on several different (both homemade and commercial) LPT keying interfaces. With the
/archives//html/NA-User/2002-06/msg00018.html (7,427 bytes)

282. [NA-User] LPT1 interface problem on new computer (score: 1)
Author: w1to@adelphia.net (Tom Homewood)
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 13:34:37 -0400
The problem could be the operating system. What was the old versus the new? Tom, W1TO
/archives//html/NA-User/2002-06/msg00019.html (8,267 bytes)

283. [NA-User] LPT1 interface problem on new computer (score: 1)
Author: steve@oakcom.com (Steve Maki)
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 13:51:07 -0400
Old computer was DOS 6.2 only, new one is dual boot DOS 6.2/WIN2000, booted to pure DOS of course. At least I THINK it's pure DOS :-) LPT is set for same address and IRQ as before. -- Steve K8LX
/archives//html/NA-User/2002-06/msg00020.html (8,072 bytes)

284. [NA-User] LPT1 interface problem on new computer (score: 1)
Author: dap14@daimlerchrysler.com (dap14@daimlerchrysler.com)
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 16:35:36 -0400
Steve, You might take a look at the BIOS settings for the LPT configuration - specifically, the LPT port may be set up as an EPP (enhanced parallel port) instead of a SPP (standard parallel port). (I
/archives//html/NA-User/2002-06/msg00021.html (11,507 bytes)

285. [NA-User] LPT1 interface problem on new computer (score: 1)
Author: steve@oakcom.com (Steve Maki)
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 20:13:01 -0400
It's the first thing I checked when the problem arose. SPP is the BIOS default, but I tried the other settings just for the hell of it. No dice. Yep, now we can be told "put paper in the tray, IDIOT"
/archives//html/NA-User/2002-06/msg00022.html (8,503 bytes)

286. [NA-User] New NA Version Coming For FD (score: 1)
Author: k8cc@comcast.net (David A. Pruett)
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 00:19:32 -0400
Just a heads up to the NA users that there will be a new NA version coming out tomorrow evening in time for Field Day 2002. Release 10.57 will have fixed the field format bug which affects the QRP an
/archives//html/NA-User/2002-06/msg00023.html (7,468 bytes)

287. [NA-User] NA With No Com Port (score: 1)
Author: n4bp@netzero.net (Bob Patten)
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 15:58:57 -0400
I just purchased a notebook computer that has two USB ports but no com port. No problem keying the rig, will use the printer port. But can anyone tell me if it's possible to use NA with a USB port fo
/archives//html/NA-User/2002-06/msg00024.html (6,721 bytes)

288. [NA-User] NA With No Com Port (score: 1)
Author: k8cc@comcast.net (David A. Pruett)
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 21:25:52 -0400
Bob, My friend Tim, K9TM was able to make NA talk to the radio using a USB-to-COM adapter. He struggled with it for a while, but then got it working so the manufacturer then wanted to know how he did
/archives//html/NA-User/2002-06/msg00025.html (7,330 bytes)

289. [NA-User] NA and network cards (score: 1)
Author: togburn@wwbt.com (Tom Ogburn)
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 22:53:24 -0400
Has anyone used NA with network cards instead of COM ports in a multi-station configuration? I.E. are there any drivers out there for that sort of thing? I seem to remember that someone wrote some dr
/archives//html/NA-User/2002-06/msg00026.html (7,028 bytes)

290. [NA-User] NA and network cards (score: 1)
Author: oh6xx@sral.fi (Juha Rantanen)
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 11:15:00 +0300
Tom, There is no similar ethernet network support in NA that is in CT. The only way to connect computers together is to use com ports either direct or in loop configuration. Juha OH6XX P.S. Dave, to
/archives//html/NA-User/2002-06/msg00027.html (8,101 bytes)

291. [NA-User] NA and network cards (score: 1)
Author: w1to@adelphia.net (Tom Homewood)
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 07:24:52 -0400
K1TTT wrote the drivers for CT. I believe he is on this reflector. Check his web site, www.k1ttt.net. Tom, W1TO
/archives//html/NA-User/2002-06/msg00028.html (7,844 bytes)

292. [NA-User] Re:NA and network cards (score: 1)
Author: okh.npi@gte.net (Rich Dailey, KA8OKH)
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 16:28:19 +0100
To be correct, there is no ethernet support in CT - rather K1TTT wrote software (nettsr) that replaces the comtsr driver that CT requires. It simply packages the com port data in a UDP frame so the
/archives//html/NA-User/2002-06/msg00029.html (7,791 bytes)

293. [NA-User] Re:NA and network cards (score: 1)
Author: oh6xx@sral.fi (Juha Rantanen)
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 21:15:36 +0300
Rich and all, This is a bit out of topic for NA reflector but please excuse me. We were at IOTA pedition on EU101 in the beginning of June and eventhough I suggested that we should use NA there I was
/archives//html/NA-User/2002-06/msg00030.html (9,387 bytes)

294. FW: [NA-User] Re:NA and network cards (score: 1)
Author: togburn@wwbt.com (Tom Ogburn)
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 15:41:42 -0400
Rich and all, This is a bit out of topic for NA reflector but please excuse me. We were at IOTA pedition on EU101 in the beginning of June and eventhough I suggested that we should use NA there I was
/archives//html/NA-User/2002-06/msg00031.html (9,768 bytes)

295. FW: [NA-User] Re:NA and network cards (score: 1)
Author: togburn@wwbt.com (Tom Ogburn)
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 15:44:04 -0400
Thanks for all of the replies. I was "cleaning out the closet" and found some networks cards and wondered if it were practical to hang on to those and put them in NA computers for a multi-op thing an
/archives//html/NA-User/2002-06/msg00032.html (10,020 bytes)

296. FW: [NA-User] Re:NA and network cards (score: 1)
Author: k8dd@arrl.net (Hank Kohl K8DD)
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 17:17:16 -0400
Tom .... I'd put the network cards in. It's a great way to get the upgrades to each NA computer. It's a great way to copy all the .qdf files to one PC and then merge them. It's a great way to get the
/archives//html/NA-User/2002-06/msg00033.html (7,527 bytes)

297. [NA-User] Country file update for WRTC - 30 June 2002 (score: 1)
Author: jjreisert@alum.mit.edu (Jim Reisert AD1C)
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 10:19:01 -0400
I have updated the country files for WRTC. All of the files can be found at: http://www.k1ea.com/cty Individual files for NA and Writelog are included in the same ZIP file. They are also available as
/archives//html/NA-User/2002-06/msg00034.html (7,265 bytes)

298. [NA-User] FLQP (score: 1)
Author: N4CW@aol.com (N4CW@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 09:49:12 EDT
I heard another station working a Florida station during the test, giving his QTH as "MAR". I later looked at the multipliers from a FL station standpoint and found that there was no such multiplier.
/archives//html/NA-User/2002-05/msg00000.html (6,279 bytes)

299. [NA-User] FLQP (score: 1)
Author: k8cc@comcast.net (David A. Pruett)
Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 19:41:55 -0400
Bert, Thanks for the heads up. When looking at the multiplier file (FLQSO.MLT) the multiplier name was "MARITIMES" but the abbreviation was "NS". Fixed now. I'd sure like to know the logic behind why
/archives//html/NA-User/2002-05/msg00001.html (8,246 bytes)

300. [NA-User] FLQP (score: 1)
Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White)
Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 19:59:51 -0400
Thanks for your help, Dave The list of mult names you were given to work from was aimed at minizing confusion of county abbreviations versus out of state mult abbreviations...which have traditionally
/archives//html/NA-User/2002-05/msg00002.html (10,388 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu