Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+Re\:\s+\[PVRC\]\s+Problem\s+with\s+CT\s+Cabrillo\s+Submission\s+to\s+ARRL\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+Re\:\s+\[PVRC\]\s+Problem\s+with\s+CT\s+Cabrillo\s+Submission\s+to\s+ARRL\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] Re: [PVRC] Problem with CT Cabrillo Submission to ARRL (score: 1): Author: steeble@erols.com (Edwin Steeble); Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 21:14:00 -0500; George, I used CT 9.62. I believe the correct command is "writelog". My first submission SS PH bounced. I had to edit the category to SINGLE-OP-ASSISTED. The robot doesn't like the canned CT entry fo; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-11/msg00134.html (8,824 bytes)
2. [ct-user] Re: [PVRC] Problem with CT Cabrillo Submission to ARRL (score: 1): Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG); Date: 26 Nov 2001 12:06:29 -0800; WRITEARRL outputs the old style <callsign>.LOG file. It is NOT Cabrillo. CT's Cabrillo output is <callsign>.TXT WRITEALL spits that out. 73 Mike N2MG ________________________________________________; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-11/msg00157.html (7,247 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]