Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+Re\:\s+Keying\s+from\s+High\s+IRQ\s+CPM\s+PORT\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+Re\:\s+Keying\s+from\s+High\s+IRQ\s+CPM\s+PORT\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] Re: Keying from High IRQ CPM PORT? (score: 1): Author: David Molvin" <wa3nko@ix.netcom.com (David Molvin); Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 21:46:54 -0500; I have been using COM3 --> IRQ2 and 6 different PC's now with ZERO problems. Try those IRQ's. -- Submissions: ct-user@contesting.com Administrative requests: ct-user-REQUEST@contesting.com WWW: http:; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-12/msg00098.html (7,087 bytes)
2. [ct-user] Re: Keying from High IRQ CPM PORT? (score: 1): Author: Brian McGinness <n3oc@wirelessinc.com> (Brian McGinness); Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 07:07:53 -0500; IRQ 2 does not always work, it is called the "cascade" IRQ and is hooked into IRQ 9 also. Sometimes you can use 2(9) and sometimes you can't. I use 10 and 11 for com3 and 4. 73, Brian N3OC -- Submiss; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-12/msg00099.html (7,594 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]