Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+Single\-multi\s+operation\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+Single\-multi\s+operation\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] Single-multi operation (score: 1): Author: Jim Pratt <n6ig@netcom.com> (Jim Pratt); Date: Sat, 1 Nov 1997 09:44:26 -0800 (PST); That's why I use two computers, two monitors, two keyboards, two radios, networked together, along with a keyer line interlock device. Of course, CT has other problems in serial-numbered contests suc; /archives//html/CT-User/1997-11/msg00007.html (7,378 bytes)
2. [ct-user] Single-multi operation (score: 1): Author: Michael A. McCarthy, W1NR" <wa1uar@eecorp.com (Michael A. McCarthy, W1NR); Date: Sat, 01 Nov 1997 18:22:14 -0500; A function key that would switch between the two radios would be a great plus. Otherwise, I agree that the two computer approach might be more productive. Mike, W1NR -- ** Give Every Man His Dew ** M; /archives//html/CT-User/1997-11/msg00008.html (8,413 bytes)
3. [ct-user] Single-multi operation (score: 1): Author: Georgens, Tom" <tgeorgen@ppdpost.ks.symbios.com (Georgens, Tom); Date: Sat, 01 Nov 97 20:57:00 CST; A number of people have suggested using two computers for two radio operation but this seems like a lot of work for little gain. When I operate, I use a modified K8CC box to monitor the second radio.; /archives//html/CT-User/1997-11/msg00010.html (10,466 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]