Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+Supercheck\-partial\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+Supercheck\-partial\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] Supercheck-partial? (score: 1): Author: Hans Brakob <k0hb@uswest.net> (Hans Brakob); Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 08:42:20 -0600; This message will probably make me about as popular as screen doors on a submarine, but hey, I've been flamed by the best.... The 'mini-flap' about too-tough checking in the SS contest just triggered; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-03/msg00026.html (7,482 bytes)
2. [ct-user] Supercheck-partial? (score: 1): Author: Ron Stordahl" <ron.stordahl@digikey.com (Ron Stordahl); Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 11:21:09 -0600; Hans If you can generate enough enthusiasm for a logging program with restricted features as you describe, perhaps someone will step forward and design one. But what would you like to eliminate? Obvi; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-03/msg00030.html (7,819 bytes)
3. [ct-user] Supercheck-partial? (score: 1): Author: Hans K0HB <k0hb@uswest.net> (Hans K0HB); Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 11:30:44 -0600; That's a good question, Ron. I think it really depends on who you ask. My "thing" is that "contesters ought to copy what is sent", so for me, I'd like to see "supercheck partial" go away, along with; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-03/msg00031.html (7,919 bytes)
4. [ct-user] Supercheck-partial? (score: 1): Author: Joe L Blackwell <aa4nn@juno.com> (Joe L Blackwell); Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 13:49:38 -0500; Right on, Hans. Maybe all single op categories should be "assisted", what with partial checks, auto-fill DX countries, any auto functions of contest programs, dupe info from another band QSO, packet; /archives//html/CT-User/1999-03/msg00032.html (7,606 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]