- 1. [ct-user] Time sync in CT 9.81 (score: 1)
- Author: ludal@dmv.com (Dallas Carter)
- Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 08:05:55 -0500
- Any of you Multi stations or those using multiple computers notice that Station 1 time is not being used to update the networked computers? I just upgraded to pentiums, and used 9.57 on the old 386/4
- /archives//html/CT-User/2002-11/msg00000.html (6,582 bytes)
- 2. [ct-user] Time sync in CT 9.81 (score: 1)
- Author: henry@summitschool.com (Henry Heidtmann)
- Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 08:41:21 -0500
- Hi, Dallas: Glad you mentioned that- we ran 3 networked machines with serial ports, and computer #1 ran fine, but did not update #2 or 3 when running a settime- But network ran flawlessly Henry, W2DZ
- /archives//html/CT-User/2002-11/msg00006.html (7,786 bytes)
- 3. [ct-user] Time sync in CT 9.81 (score: 1)
- Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (David Robbins)
- Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 06:43:48 -0500 (EST)
- 7 machines on ethernet running 9.81 worked fine here with time set from station 1. David Robbins K1TTT e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net web: http://www.k1ttt.net AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://d
- /archives//html/CT-User/2002-11/msg00015.html (8,719 bytes)
- 4. [ct-user] Time sync in CT 9.81 (score: 1)
- Author: n2tk@arrl.net (N2TK)
- Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 07:07:29 -0500
- Dave, does station 1 dictate the time for all the stations? Trying to find out why the 3 pc's jumped by one hour during the contest. This would help me focus on the correct pc. Tnx Tony N2TK --Origin
- /archives//html/CT-User/2002-11/msg00017.html (9,395 bytes)
- 5. [ct-user] Time sync in CT 9.81 (score: 1)
- Author: ludal@dmv.com (Dallas Carter)
- Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 08:56:51 -0500
- Yes, that is the way it is supposed to work. Dallas -- Original Message -- From: N2TK <tony.kaz@verizon.net> To: <k1ttt@arrl.net>; <henry@summitschool.com> Cc: <ludal@dmv.com>; <ct-user@contesting.co
- /archives//html/CT-User/2002-11/msg00023.html (10,328 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu