Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[na\-user\]\s+Cabrillo\s+format\s+error\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[na\-user\]\s+Cabrillo\s+format\s+error\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [na-user] Cabrillo format error (score: 1): Author: mressler@digizen.net (mressler@digizen.net); Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 22:52:35 -0400; In looking at the cabrillo (CALL.log) output for our field day effort I noticed that the "sent" class exchange matches the received exchange instead of being our class (1A). Has anyone else seen this; /archives//html/NA-User/2000-06/msg00006.html (7,404 bytes)
2. [na-user] Cabrillo format error (score: 1): Author: k8cc <k8cc@mediaone.net> (k8cc); Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 23:01:06 -0400; Rick, K7GDN also spotted this problem. As the result of his report, we've got this fixed already for the next NA release. In looking at the NA code, we've determined that this bug effects only Field; /archives//html/NA-User/2000-06/msg00007.html (8,041 bytes)
3. [na-user] Cabrillo format error (score: 1): Author: Ron Wetjen <wd4ahz@gte.net> (Ron Wetjen); Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 03:16:30 +0000; Yep, he's correct ... just checked, same thing here! Also, our 2 meter QSO's show up as B. I guess it's not too critical though, since all we need to submit for Field Day is a dupe sheet. Thanks for; /archives//html/NA-User/2000-06/msg00008.html (8,078 bytes)
4. [na-user] Cabrillo format error (score: 1): Author: k8cc <k8cc@mediaone.net> (k8cc); Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 23:35:01 -0400; This is correct. The Cabrillo spec uses A = 50, B = 144, C = 222, etc. just like the contest writeups in QST. I questioned the Cabrillo author, N5KO about this but he said that all the ARRL cared abo; /archives//html/NA-User/2000-06/msg00009.html (7,058 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]