Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[na\-user\]\s+SS\s+Exchange\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[na\-user\]\s+SS\s+Exchange\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [na-user] SS Exchange (score: 1): Author: dap14@chrysler.com (dap14@chrysler.com); Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 11:04:55 -0500; With regards to the question raised by W4LC about the sequence of the NA's data fields for SS, I've been waiting for someone else to address this issue. However, since nobody else has stepped up, let; /archives//html/NA-User/1997-11/msg00029.html (8,002 bytes)
2. [na-user] SS Exchange (score: 1): Author: Bill Fisher - W4AN <w4an@contesting.com> (Bill Fisher - W4AN); Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 11:24:59 -0500 (EST); There is nothing wrong with NA in regards to the exchange sequence. It makes perfect sense. The only thing better would be if NA took the sequence in any order and sorted it out for you. For example.; /archives//html/NA-User/1997-11/msg00030.html (7,857 bytes)
3. [na-user] SS exchange (score: 1): Author: Bill Long <wlong@wmdc.edu> (Bill Long); Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 19:03:01 +0000; Maybe the problem is that contesters are not sending the exchange according to the contest rules. I think the SS examples on how to deliver the exchange specify it to be sent in the order that NA ex; /archives//html/NA-User/1997-11/msg00033.html (7,188 bytes)
4. [na-user] SS Exchange (score: 1): Author: K4OJ@aol.com (K4OJ@aol.com); Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 00:16:05 -0500 (EST); << The only thing better would be if NA took the sequence in any order and sorted it out for you. >> what Tree did this idea come from? oj -- Submissions: na-user@contesting.com Administrative reques; /archives//html/NA-User/1997-11/msg00041.html (6,957 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]