Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[spam\]\s+Re\:\s+\[spam\]\s+\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+\-\s+second\s+week\s+impressionsandcomparisons\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[spam\]\s+Re\:\s+\[spam\]\s+\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+\-\s+second\s+week\s+impressionsandcomparisons\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [spam] Re: [spam] [TenTec] Orion - second week impressionsandcomparisons (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 13:30:30 -0400; Shame on you...that was supposed to be a secret... :-)) _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00781.html (14,685 bytes)
2. [spam] Re: [spam] [TenTec] Orion - second week impressionsandcomparisons (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 15:28:26 -0400; Not important...you still have the QSK cult chant: "QSK...dead relay...QSK...dead relay...QSK...dead relay." If there were only a few more of you folks we could all buy stock in relay companies and; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00788.html (7,870 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]