Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*24\s+hr\s+contest\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*24\s+hr\s+contest\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. 24 hr contest (score: 1): Author: ames@nebula.decnet.lockheed.com (ames@nebula.decnet.lockheed.com); Date: Tue Feb 23 15:32:28 1993; shorter contest definately favor better operators, higher CW speeds, better equipment, etc. but longer contest do not favor the converse, as illustrated by Novice Roundup which extends over 9 days bu; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-02/msg00127.html (7,161 bytes)
2. 24 hr contest (score: 1): Author: hardie@herald.usask.ca (Peter Hardie); Date: Wed Feb 24 12:05:27 1993; It seems that the push for a 24 hr contest is primarily coming from single ops. I think Ron's (N6EE) idea of a 24 contiguous hours interval for single ops is a good idea with one modification. Just a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-02/msg00151.html (7,298 bytes)
3. 24 hr contest (score: 1): Author: 76703.3035@CompuServe.COM (Steve Silverwood [CA]); Date: Wed Feb 24 22:37:10 1993; Sounds like a good idea to me. With the vocal anti-contest crowd out there, this sounds like a more viable alternative than creating a whole new contest, and the inevitable hue and cry such a decisi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-02/msg00165.html (7,250 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]