Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*80\s+meter\s+sloper\s+array\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*80\s+meter\s+sloper\s+array\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. 80 meter sloper array (score: 1): Author: jrob@epix.net (jrob@epix.net); Date: Mon, 02 Sep 1996 06:38:55 -0700; Howdy all, I am thinking about putting up an array of slopers on the tower. The attached heighth would be about a quarter wave and a descent amount of radials would be attached to tower base. Are the; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-09/msg00019.html (7,164 bytes)
2. 80 meter sloper array (score: 1): Author: rpmarkey@nbn.net (Rick Markey); Date: Mon, 2 Sep 1996 16:27:57 -0400; Check the antenna handbook. It used to contain a 40M system like the = one you are contemplating. I think it used 5 slopers. Before going the = 1/4 wave route, you might consider a system of shortene; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-09/msg00021.html (7,750 bytes)
3. 80 meter sloper array (score: 1): Author: account_custodian@ntsqm1.uswc.uswest.com (account custodian); Date: 3 Sep 1996 10:08:19 -0600; Mail*Link(r) SMTP 80 meter sloper array Howdy all, I am thinking about putting up an array of slopers on the tower. The attached heighth would be about a quarter wave and a descent amount of radials; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-09/msg00028.html (8,920 bytes)
4. 80 meter sloper array (score: 1): Author: k6ll@juno.com (David O. Hachadorian); Date: Mon, 26 Aug 1996 17:10:59 PST; Hi Jeff, Slopers are highly dependent upon the tower, what antennas are on and near the tower, and ground conductivity. I would recommend computer modeling to see how your proposed configuration woul; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-08/msg00296.html (7,866 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]