Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*AW\:\s+\[TenTec\]\s+Question\s+for\s+Contesters\:\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*AW\:\s+\[TenTec\]\s+Question\s+for\s+Contesters\:\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. AW: [TenTec] Question for Contesters: (score: 1): Author: "Carsten Esch" <carsten.esch@appello.de>; Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 09:43:20 +0200; ... better to 'fix' problems or add features during the lifetime of a product via Firmware than just ignoring them like YAESU is doing with the Key-Klick problem for years now in the FT-1000x design!; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00187.html (9,436 bytes)
2. Re: AW: [TenTec] Question for Contesters: (score: 1): Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>; Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 07:02:21 -0400; Reality is that FT-1000x was released with a number of problems two orders of magnitude smaller than Orion's. I'd put aside the possibility of adding any new features to Orion at least until it begin; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00188.html (8,973 bytes)
3. AW: [TenTec] Question for Contesters: (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 08:40:53 -0400; two orders of magnitude smaller than Orion's. Sinisa, I must respectfully and strongly disagree. Yaesu FT-1000X radios have been polluting our band with terrible key clicks for at least 15 years now; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00189.html (8,076 bytes)
4. Re: AW: [TenTec] Question for Contesters: (score: 1): Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>; Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 11:07:28 -0400; That's true, but that's a single problem, and I was referring to the number of problems known to exist. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VA3TTN _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list Te; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00197.html (7,200 bytes)
5. Re: AW: [TenTec] Question for Contesters: (score: 1): Author: Ulrich Hilsinger <dh0ghu@dh0ghu.de>; Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 20:43:58 +0200; Hello, sorry, but I completely disagree with you, Sinisa. First, there is no higher-magnitude error than a bad transmit signal. Every other error is only harmull to the operator itself, a FT1000X can; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00208.html (14,969 bytes)
6. Re: AW: [TenTec] Question for Contesters: (score: 1): Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>; Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 15:49:49 -0400; Having to reboot several times during WPX, for example. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VA3TTN _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00211.html (7,839 bytes)
7. Re: AW: [TenTec] Question for Contesters: (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 16:51:29 -0400; Strange...I operated the entire WPX CW test in the split VFO mode, for 1024 Q's and didn't have to reboot once. Seems to me v1.37 fixed that problem. Tom - W4BQF _____________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00215.html (8,587 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]