Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Again\s+\.\.\.\.\s+Omni\s+series\s+vint\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Again\s+\.\.\.\.\s+Omni\s+series\s+vint\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Again .... Omni series vint (score: 1): Author: cbrudtk@ntsqm1_out.mnet.uswest.com (Chuck Brudtkuhl); Date: 22 Aug 1996 13:37:31 -0600; I read with interest the confusion around the various Omni alpha suffix designations. I thought I had it all figured out prior to reading the discussion and was "relieved" when someone finally agreed; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-08/msg00036.html (7,450 bytes)
2. Again .... Omni series vint (score: 1): Author: cbrudtk@ntsqm1_out.mnet.uswest.com (Chuck Brudtkuhl); Date: Fri, 23 Aug 1996 10:01:38 -0500; I read with interest the confusion around the various Omni alpha suffix designations. I thought I had it all figured out prior to reading the discussion and was "relieved" when someone finally agreed; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-08/msg00038.html (8,482 bytes)
3. Again .... Omni series vint (score: 1): Author: n4LQ@iglou.com (Steve Ellington); Date: Fri, 23 Aug 1996 12:58:34 -0700; Things were starting to make sense until I saw this statement. Final version was the series C. This one came in digital only and was identified as Omni D only. Are you saying that Omni c's are really; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-08/msg00039.html (6,864 bytes)
4. Again .... Omni series vint (score: 1): Author: n4LQ@iglou.com (Steve Ellington); Date: Sat, 24 Aug 1996 16:18:26 -0500; Things were starting to make sense until I saw this statement. Final version was the series C. This one came in digital only and was identified as Omni D only. Are you saying that Omni c's are really; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-08/msg00040.html (7,762 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]