Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Fcc\s+and\s+Vanity$delete\s+if\s+not\s+interested$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Fcc\s+and\s+Vanity$delete\s+if\s+not\s+interested$\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Fcc and Vanity(delete if not interested) (score: 1): Author: ramirezk@emi.com (ramirezk@emi.com); Date: Sun Oct 6 10:31:49 1996; To all of you complaining about the FCC and vanity procedures, What mess are you referring to? The FCC is doing it the fairest way possible under the circumstances. Just because they fouled up your p; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-10/msg00040.html (7,406 bytes)
2. Fcc and Vanity(delete if not interested) (score: 1): Author: k4sb@avana.net (k4sb@avana.net); Date: Mon Oct 7 18:24:06 1996; Bernie, I think you're right. Let's just drop it. If you guys are satisfied, who am I to complain. But where in the world did you get the idea I could get the whole program cancelled? The Congress of; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-10/msg00051.html (7,128 bytes)
3. Fcc and Vanity(delete if not interested) (score: 1): Author: tad.danley@mail.nextel.com (tad.danley@mail.nextel.com); Date: Mon Oct 7 19:37:34 1996; Apparently the FCC is not allowing vanity applications to disturb their "normal" work load: I have a friend who wants to get into CONTESTING and he passed his first ham test the evening of Friday, Se; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-10/msg00053.html (7,045 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]