- 1. Follow-up on traps as loads (score: 1)
- Author: cebik@utkux.utcc.utk.edu (L. B. Cebik)
- Date: Tue, 18 Feb 1997 09:46:40 -0500 (EST)
- Antenna Element Losses I thought I might follow up on the discussion of "losses" due to traps with some quantification via modeling. This will graphically illustrate the fact that the insertion of lo
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00379.html (14,991 bytes)
- 2. Follow-up on traps as loads (score: 1)
- Author: 75052.3037@CompuServe.COM (Roger A. Cox WB0DGF)
- Date: 18 Feb 97 15:12:02 EST
- A Q of 100 for 10 and 15 meter traps seems very low. I beleive that our (TH7DX) trap coils are closer to Q=300. I can measure them and post the results if anyone is interested. I also agree with Tony
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00392.html (7,235 bytes)
- 3. Follow-up on traps as loads (score: 1)
- Author: ejensen@nmsu.edu (Ed Jensen)
- Date: Wed, 19 Feb 1997 10:43:20 -0600
- Hi Roger, (TH7DX) anyone is interested. Roger, I have used Hygain dipoles and multi and single band beam antennas since 1958 and have always admired the mechanical design and directivity. Now I have
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00420.html (7,666 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu