Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Hot\s+Antennas\s+was\s+Hygain\s+52\'\s+Crankup\s+\-\s+good\s+for\s+me\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Hot\s+Antennas\s+was\s+Hygain\s+52\'\s+Crankup\s+\-\s+good\s+for\s+me\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Hot Antennas was Hygain 52' Crankup - good for me? (score: 1): Author: w7zrc@micron.net (Rod Greene); Date: Mon, 1 Jul 96 17:25 MDT; Hmmmm, could this test have been performed in the hot southern climes of AZ? I'll bet my XA would burn your hands today with temps around 100 deg.F. and no RF applied.... 73, Rod --snip-- -- Rod Gree; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-07/msg00012.html (8,089 bytes)
2. Hot Antennas was Hygain 52' Crankup - good for me? (score: 1): Author: K8DO@aol.com (K8DO@aol.com); Date: Tue, 2 Jul 1996 14:32:03 -0400; << towertalk@contesting.com AZ? Well, I have some problems with the premise that the KT34XA traps have that much internal resistance that there is significant heating under rf load... I have that ant; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-07/msg00014.html (7,289 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]