Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LOW\s+POWER\s+IN\s+CONTESTS\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LOW\s+POWER\s+IN\s+CONTESTS\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LOW POWER IN CONTESTS (score: 1): Author: K7SV@aol.com (K7SV@aol.com); Date: Fri Jan 17 09:12:57 1997; The ability to quickly switch bands with modern transceivers is part of what makes the NAQP attractive. The low power class also attracts some of us that restrict our operation to low power for a var; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-01/msg00039.html (11,336 bytes)
2. Low Power in Contests (score: 1): Author: tjs@dfw.net (tjs@dfw.net); Date: Fri Jan 17 16:18:44 1997; I agree, 100 Watts is the most sensible limit. BTW, I believe operator skill more than makes up the difference between 100 and 150 Watts anyway... I had some difficult TVI problems while in Denver an; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-01/msg00041.html (10,612 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]