- 1. Networking CT (score: 1)
- Author: 8909296@ul.ie (John Barry EI7DNB The Bandit)
- Date: Thu Oct 8 18:07:00 1992
- Hello, For last years CQWW we had to network CT between our two stations. We used two pk88's in transparent mode on 2m, and it worked a treat. Any entry on one terminal was sent to the other.... Howe
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-10/msg00015.html (6,766 bytes)
- 2. Networking CT (score: 1)
- Author: n6tv@vnet.ibm.com (Robert A. Wilson)
- Date: Thu Oct 8 19:03:36 1992
- As I recall, there was a bug in CT that Ken fixed mid-contest last year. The problem was as you described: incoming QSOs from other stations would wipe out partial calls you were just entering. I als
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-10/msg00018.html (6,801 bytes)
- 3. Networking CT (score: 1)
- Author: joel@hibp1.ecse.rpi.edu (Joel Glickman)
- Date: Fri Oct 9 14:58:35 1992
- Has anyone had trouble running a CT network at 9600 baud? I've never been able to get it to work properly.. If you simply connect two machines together with a serial cable, configure properly for 960
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-10/msg00023.html (7,014 bytes)
- 4. Networking CT (score: 1)
- Author: n6tv@vnet.ibm.com (Robert A. Wilson)
- Date: Thu Oct 8 19:03:36 1992
- As I recall, there was a bug in CT that Ken fixed mid-contest last year. The problem was as you described: incoming QSOs from other stations would wipe out partial calls you were just entering. I als
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-10/msg00093.html (6,777 bytes)
- 5. Networking CT (score: 1)
- Author: n6tv@vnet.ibm.com (Robert A. Wilson)
- Date: Thu Oct 8 19:03:36 1992
- As I recall, there was a bug in CT that Ken fixed mid-contest last year. The problem was as you described: incoming QSOs from other stations would wipe out partial calls you were just entering. I als
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1992-10/msg00109.html (6,834 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu