Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*No\s+subject\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*No\s+subject\s*$/: 333 ]

Total 333 documents matching your query.

21. No subject (score: 1): Author: ids@nol.net (R.S.Hradilek); Date: Wed Jul 14 04:44:28 1999; copy. Now we are getting somewhere. I like this idea. The QRL scenario needs more abbreviation for CW contests. This would have to be adopted by convention among contesters so we would all recognize; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-07/msg00149.html (9,305 bytes)
22. No subject (score: 1): Author: gdaught6@leland.Stanford.EDU (George T. Daughters); Date: Tue Jul 27 11:15:59 1999; Hi, Stewart wrote... <snip> No need to establish who the guy is! I turn my tuning knob and go right on by. This is one of the ways to apply "peer pressure" which is what we hams are supposed to use t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-07/msg00174.html (7,810 bytes)
23. No subject (score: 1): Author: vk3ajj@techno.net.au (vk3ajj); Date: Thu Jul 29 22:58:15 1999; "It really bugged me, so I asked for full calls only. It worked great for about 5 qso's. Then others who never heard the announcement kept sending last 2. For some reason, the last twoers were the lo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-07/msg00196.html (7,776 bytes)
24. No subject (score: 1): Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry Kutner); Date: Sat Sep 11 01:33:29 1999; FOURTH INTERNET RTTY SPRINT CONTEST Contest period: 01:00:00Z to 03:00:00Z on Oct 7th, 1999. This is Wednesday evening in the USA. Bands: 40 and 20 meters only (this is a real radio contest, no inter; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-09/msg00043.html (9,067 bytes)
25. No subject (score: 1): Author: rtnash@netcom.ca (rtnash@netcom.ca); Date: Fri Jan 16 16:57:18 1998; Sorry for the extra Bandwidth. Wrong ending on the first message. Nice to know the callsign. Is anyone aware of a logging software program that includes the Bermuda Contest? Customizing some of the e; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-01/msg00356.html (6,702 bytes)
26. No subject (score: 1): Author: guest@e2403roc.nsr.hp.com (Guest Account); Date: Mon Jan 19 09:50:11 1998; [Newington, CT] - Citing concerns by Western US hams voiced after new Canadian and US sections entered the amateur radio mainstream, the American Radio Relay League today announced the creation of th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-01/msg00419.html (9,046 bytes)
27. No subject (score: 1): Author: rw4wr@izhcom.ru (Sandy Orlov); Date: Tue Mar 17 16:06:44 1998; Hello All! 1. I am looking contesters, who is using TS-870 in the contests. I would like to buy it and I want to know any comments about it. 2. I have FT-990AC and What is the better? TS-870 or FT-99; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-03/msg00313.html (6,161 bytes)
28. No subject (score: 1): Author: nh7a@radiomaui.com (Al Crespo); Date: Thu Apr 9 00:48:42 1998; Jim, Thank you for posting the scores. It is a huge amount of work that is greatly appreciated. Aloha, Al -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-cont; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-04/msg00146.html (6,202 bytes)
29. No subject (score: 1): Author: skaras@earthlink.net (Stan); Date: Mon May 4 23:31:43 1998; --==_894346303==_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" --==_894346303==_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" IF NO ONE HAS ANY OBJECTION I WOULD LIKE TO TAKE OVER THE GREAT!!!! WORK; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-05/msg00040.html (6,972 bytes)
30. No subject (score: 1): Author: kl7y@alaska.net (Dan Robbins); Date: Mon May 25 11:50:41 1998; "I have been "invited" to operate at stations with BIG AMPS and I simply will NOT go...even if they do NOT run amp. Just HAVING IT THERE is enough to keep me away! As stated, JUST STAY AWAY!" Followi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-05/msg00259.html (8,201 bytes)
31. No subject (score: 1): Author: n6tr@teleport.com (Tree N6TR); Date: Tue Jun 16 22:31:18 1998; Based on the notes about the 10 Meter Contest results, it looks like the July QST is out. My normal contest-related summary will have to wait until I return from my current business trip to Pittsburg; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-06/msg00143.html (8,072 bytes)
32. No subject (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@radio.org (Bill Coleman AA4LR); Date: Thu Jun 18 11:38:28 1998; Hey, Bill, where's the slot for SOAB Low Power - limited to ZERO towers...? <grin> I agree completely with this principle. And, indeed, in some competition, it may be that some of those puny scores m; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-06/msg00153.html (9,150 bytes)
33. No subject (score: 1): Author: lu5cw@usa.net (LU5CW Ernesto Grueneberg); Date: Tue Jun 23 00:01:06 1998; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0187_01BD9E31.A5CFFF60 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--=_NextPart_001_0188_01BD9E31.A5D7A080" --=_NextPart_001_0188_01BD; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-06/msg00191.html (7,900 bytes)
34. No subject (score: 1): Author: k7qq@juno.com (Rex J Maner); Date: Fri Jun 26 02:34:02 1998; Help Anyone out there used the Contest Voice Blaster Version 2.0 from Datom Engineering Any problem getting it to work ? Thanks Rex K7QQ ______________________________________________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-06/msg00207.html (6,693 bytes)
35. No subject (score: 1): Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher - W4AN); Date: Tue Jul 21 08:58:52 1998; I signed K6T after each and every QSO during WRTC96. I believe my partner did also. Following Mr Norton's logic, one would assume that we would have finished at or near the bottom of the list. We wer; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00180.html (6,620 bytes)
36. No subject (score: 1): Author: Va3mg@aol.com (Va3mg@aol.com); Date: Thu Aug 27 17:27:26 1998; I would like to appolagize to Steve W8BJQ the CQ WPX Manager regarding my posting of a single station operating on two bands as a single band entry. This was not correct and I do appoligize toSteve a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00285.html (6,907 bytes)
37. No subject (score: 1): Author: Va3mg@aol.com (Va3mg@aol.com); Date: Thu Aug 27 17:27:26 1998; I would like to appolagize to Steve W8BJQ the CQ WPX Manager regarding my posting of a single station operating on two bands as a single band entry. This was not correct and I do appoligize toSteve a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00291.html (6,841 bytes)
38. No subject (score: 1): Author: Va3mg@aol.com (Va3mg@aol.com); Date: Thu Aug 27 17:27:26 1998; I would like to appolagize to Steve W8BJQ the CQ WPX Manager regarding my posting of a single station operating on two bands as a single band entry. This was not correct and I do appoligize toSteve a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00297.html (6,459 bytes)
39. No subject (score: 1): Author: un7lg@postbox.kst.kz (Pavel Pershin); Date: Thu Nov 12 07:26:43 1998; Hi everybody, Soon we will start operating in new CW WW DX Contest but I till now can not find my results on 40 mtrs band in previous 1997 WW CW DX Contest.These thing happen in province sometimes. W; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-11/msg00180.html (6,528 bytes)
40. No subject (score: 1): Author: un7lg@postbox.kst.kz (Pavel Pershin); Date: Fri Nov 13 06:19:24 1998; Thanks everybody who helped me to find my CQ WW CW 97 Contest result. But I have found some mistakes. My result was published as: 1673 QSO 38 zone 120 cty = 611,618points But really it is slip of the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-11/msg00190.html (6,569 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17]