Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Non\-magnetic\s+stainless\s+steel\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Non\-magnetic\s+stainless\s+steel\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Non-magnetic Stainless Steel (score: 1): Author: wa2moe@doitnow.com (wa2moe@doitnow.com); Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1996 08:15:50 -0700; does anyone remember how this thread started ...or became unravelled? Stu Greene WA2MOE 7537 North 28th Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 85051 USA wa2moe@doitnow.com -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/t; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-11/msg00138.html (7,038 bytes)
2. Non-magnetic Stainless Steel (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1996 12:59:50 -0500; Actually I thought the latest post from Pat Doyle was worth the price of admission. Something that I don't think was mentioned was the fact that if you are going to use SS hardware is the recommendat; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-11/msg00140.html (7,373 bytes)
3. Non-magnetic stainless steel (score: 1): Author: w7xu@juno.com (A N Thompson); Date: Fri, 15 Nov 1996 09:11:02 PST; Quoting from a Vincent Brass & Aluminum Co. catalog, under the section "Identifying Stainless Steel Types": 'Magnet tests . . . Austentic (sic) (300 series types) are nonmagnetic; the others are magn; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-11/msg00149.html (7,642 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]