Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Odp\:\s+Topband\:\s+Rx\s+Antennas\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Odp\:\s+Topband\:\s+Rx\s+Antennas\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Odp: Topband: Rx Antennas (score: 1): Author: rtym@ippt.gov.pl (Ryszard Tymkiewicz); Date: Tue, 7 Sep 1999 14:41:39 +0200; Art, I was using EWEs,K9AY and Pennant antennas.In my case EWEs were not working too well. I've been very satisfied particularly with K9AY loops which are very easy to change directions and really ha; /archives//html/Topband/1999-09/msg00025.html (7,164 bytes)
2. Odp: Topband: Rx Antennas (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Tue, 7 Sep 1999 12:33:54 -0400; Hi Rys, EWE's work best over very good soil or even better yet over a ground screen. They are really just two verticals fed with crossfire phase. The "flat top wire" is a non-radiating transmission l; /archives//html/Topband/1999-09/msg00026.html (7,371 bytes)
3. Odp: Topband: Rx Antennas (score: 1): Author: rtym@ippt.gov.pl (Ryszard Tymkiewicz); Date: Wed, 08 Sep 1999 06:57:48 +0200; OK Tom, I know K9AY loops are working in the same way as EWEs do. I suppose the reason EWEs were not working well in my case is that I have small garden 1000 sq.m /30m X 30m/ and a lot of tranmitting; /archives//html/Topband/1999-09/msg00029.html (7,298 bytes)
4. Odp: Topband: Rx Antennas (score: 1): Author: Aprewitt@prodigy.net (Aprewitt); Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 08:09:27 -0700; Thanks for all the comments on RX antennas, it was very helpful. The ground (rocks) here is very poor. Again thanks all for the info and suggestions. Art N4PT -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com; /archives//html/Topband/1999-09/msg00036.html (7,070 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]