- 1. Omni-6... another complaint (score: 1)
- Author: woffutt@davinci.netaxis.com (wallace offutt)
- Date: Sat, 2 Mar 1996 22:25:30 -0500 (EST)
- When I was discussing buying my new OMNI VI with Scott, KF2P (?) in January I asked him if anyone at Ten-Tec was reading these reflectors. Much to my surprise he said that no one was. I told him how
- /archives//html/TenTec/1996-03/msg00001.html (7,286 bytes)
- 2. Omni-6... another complaint (score: 1)
- Author: K8DO@aol.com (K8DO@aol.com)
- Date: Mon, 4 Mar 1996 18:12:07 -0500
- My biggest problem is getting the guys to NOT use the 250 cycle... They sit there with it dialed in, and a silly smile on their faces.... The problem is that many DX stations can't get within 250 cyc
- /archives//html/TenTec/1996-03/msg00003.html (6,936 bytes)
- 3. Omni-6... another complaint (score: 1)
- Author: km9p@akorn.net (Bill Fisher, KM9P)
- Date: Mon, 26 Feb 1996 20:50:36 -0500 (EST)
- One thing that the Japs figured out about 10 years ago, was that 20DB of attenuation (only) was not enough. Most of the time I run my Icoms at 10DB of attenuation. I'm sure there are others here that
- /archives//html/TenTec/1996-02/msg00016.html (6,125 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu