Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Omni\s+VI\s+and\s+Corsair\s+II\s+comparison\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Omni\s+VI\s+and\s+Corsair\s+II\s+comparison\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Omni VI and Corsair II comparison (score: 1): Author: junger@usgs.gov (Unger); Date: Fri, 10 Jan 1997 14:03:15 -0500; As promised a while ago, I have written this look at the Omni VI is from the perspective of a Corsair II user (and fan!) for hams on the TenTec reflector to read. This purely subjective information c; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-01/msg00069.html (13,073 bytes)
2. Omni VI and Corsair II comparison (score: 1): Author: seay@alaska.net (Del Seay); Date: Fri, 10 Jan 1997 12:20:04 -0800; Hi John: Thanks for the great comparitive report for the Corsair II and the Omni-VI. I would like to comment on the qsk output from the OMNI-VI. As you pointed out, it is different than the Corsairs.; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-01/msg00072.html (7,923 bytes)
3. Omni VI and Corsair II comparison (score: 1): Author: MARTY_GULSETH@HP-Spokane-om2.om.hp.com (MARTY_GULSETH@HP-Spokane-om2.om.hp.com); Date: Mon, 13 Jan 97 17:49:35 -0700; Item Subject: Omni VI and Corsair II comparison Hello All, For what it's worth - I'll second John's comment on the Omni VI RX (his message, snipped, below...) I have had my pre-owned Omni VI for abou; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-01/msg00081.html (9,070 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]