Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Pro\-57b\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Pro\-57b\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Pro-57b (score: 1): Author: dwright@microagesf.com (Dave Wright); Date: Thu, 2 Jan 1997 13:29:15 -0800; Thank you all for your response on the SWR issue with my Pro-57b. The response was fantastic! To answer Billy's question, I am measuring the SWR at the shack. Yes, I know it's better to measure at th; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-01/msg00032.html (9,181 bytes)
2. Pro-57b (score: 1): Author: dwright@microagesf.com (Dave Wright); Date: Mon, 30 Dec 1996 14:40:08 -0800; Greetings all, I put up a Mosley Pro-57b about a year ago, and am experiencing a slowly climbing SWR on 10 & 15/17 meters. At first it was fine except for a slightly high SWR on 10, 1:8:1. On 15/17 i; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-12/msg00508.html (7,961 bytes)
3. Pro-57b (score: 1): Author: aa4nu@ix.netcom.com (Billy W. Cox); Date: Mon, 30 Dec 1996 17:29:32 -0800; Hi Dave ! When you mention using the 4 meters, where are you measuring the SWR ? At the yagi feedpoint or in the shack at the end of the coax ? Right NOW, the 2.5:1 SWR on 10m ... is that measured in; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-12/msg00510.html (8,078 bytes)
4. Pro-57b (score: 1): Author: n4si@techinter.com (n4si); Date: Sun, 29 Dec 1996 21:45:14 +0000; Dave, I installed a PRO 57 or 67 (I don't remember which) for a friend several years ago. One thing I didn't like about it was how the feedline attached to the tuning rods. We noticed anomalous SWR; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-12/msg00512.html (9,238 bytes)
5. Pro-57b (score: 1): Author: dnorris@k7no.com (Dean Norris); Date: Mon, 30 Dec 1996 18:07:22 -0700; of the amp. 15 & 17 now seem to be following- From 1:2:1 up to >1:8:1 now. The factory told me to check the length of the coax/shield >"Y" at the feedpoint and try making it shorter. Would we guess 9; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-12/msg00514.html (8,942 bytes)
6. Pro-57b (score: 1): Author: WF3H@enter.net (bob); Date: Tue, 31 Dec 1996 03:08:12 -0100; ive got a 67b so dont know how much this will help...but that 'y' isnt hard to replace..you dont have to drop the antenna since it should be accessible from the tower top. something like water gettin; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-12/msg00516.html (7,328 bytes)
7. Pro-57b (score: 1): Author: n4si@techinter.com (n4si); Date: Mon, 30 Dec 1996 01:07:22 +0000; I forgot to mention that in my earlier post, checking, changing, testing the feedline to the tuning stubs is a top-o-the-tower job; no dropping the aluminum. Incidentally, that's a desirable design; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-12/msg00517.html (7,729 bytes)
8. Pro-57b (score: 1): Author: hb@cpimaging.com (Howard Brainen); Date: Mon, 30 Dec 1996 22:35:45 -0800; My KLM 40 has been up at 140' for 10 years without a problem. It's heavily modified, as you might expect! For the shorting bars, I drilled through the clamp (the formed flat stock) and the tubing, an; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-12/msg00520.html (8,213 bytes)
9. pro-57b (score: 1): Author: jbalws@iland.net (Jim D. Bales); Date: Tue, 31 Dec 1996 19:15:25 -0500; Dave about your rising swr on 10-15-20 with your 57b, I'm having the = same problem with my pro 67b. I called mosley and talked with Gary Sr. = about this and his thoughts were to look at the traps o; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-12/msg00529.html (7,313 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]