Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Proposed\s+crankup\s+configuration\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Proposed\s+crankup\s+configuration\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Proposed crankup configuration (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Fri, 3 Jan 1997 13:50:49 -0500; Hi, Dean -- Sounds like a pretty nice setup and will give you all-band capabilities. Needless to say the TX455 (18 sq. ft. @ 50 MPH) will be overloaded at your 75 MPH county wind speed rating by a si; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-01/msg00042.html (8,501 bytes)
2. Proposed crankup configuration (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Fri, 3 Jan 1997 16:09:09 -0500; Chadster -- The 1936 is correcto mundo and right out of the Hy-Gain catalog. Why would it be gross and extreme? You're not looking at this from the perspective of the rotator; it has to swing an ante; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-01/msg00045.html (8,929 bytes)
3. Proposed crankup configuration (score: 1): Author: kurscj@oampc12.csg.mot.com (Chad Kurszewski WE9V); Date: Fri, 03 Jan 1997 16:01:22 -0600; Yes, Yes, Yes. Reported moment....good. But you mentioned "weight times turning radius", which is NOT moment. Moment would be weight times EFFECTIVE radius (or moment arm). Turning radius has nothin; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-01/msg00048.html (8,717 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]