Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*RE\s+\:\s+\[Amps\]\s+\.82\s+ohm\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. RE : [Amps] .82 ohm (score: 1)
Author: "hermans" <on4kj@skynet.be>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 22:03:28 +0200
What about putting 4 x 330E (0.6 W) in //? Jos on4kj --Message d'origine-- De?: amps-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:amps-bounces@contesting.com] De la part de kwasny Envoy&eacute;?: lundi 6 d&eacute;
/archives//html/Amps/2004-12/msg00115.html (7,956 bytes)

2. Re: RE : [Amps] .82 ohm (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 12:30:57 -0800
The safest thing to put in place of a kaput grid-current meter shunt (R3) is a jumper wire since the meter can not could not be damaged by another anomaly, and grid-current metering is of no value -
/archives//html/Amps/2004-12/msg00118.html (7,910 bytes)

3. Re: RE : [Amps] .82 ohm (score: 1)
Author: "kwasny" <kwasny@netzero.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 10:24:16 -0500
How would one determine if the grid current is being exceded? I have no doubt that is was caused the problem with my SB-220 in the first place. I inadvertently drove it at full output from my exciter
/archives//html/Amps/2004-12/msg00120.html (9,008 bytes)

4. Re: RE : [Amps] .82 ohm (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 08:39:24 -0800
On Dec 7, 2004, at 7:24 AM, kwasny wrote: -- Original Message -- From: "R.Measures" <r@somis.org> To: "hermans" <on4kj@skynet.be> Cc: <amps@contesting.com>; "'kwasny'" <kwasny@netzero.net> Sent: Mond
/archives//html/Amps/2004-12/msg00121.html (10,620 bytes)

5. Re: RE : [Amps] .82 ohm (score: 1)
Author: Colin Lamb <k7fm@teleport.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 09:17:22 -0800 (GMT-08:00)
"if a g-g amplifier is tuned for max P-out, grid dissipation will always be reasonable" It seems that statement includes the reasons why a grid meter is desired. Let us explore one example. The anten
/archives//html/Amps/2004-12/msg00122.html (11,987 bytes)

6. RE: RE : [Amps] .82 ohm (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Clarson" <mclarson@rcc.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 12:28:35 -0500
It seems quite unlikely that 120 watts would blow the .82 ohm shunt. Oter forces were at work (Parasitics likely). I often looked at the grid current but never actually used the reading for anything.
/archives//html/Amps/2004-12/msg00123.html (9,741 bytes)

7. Re: RE : [Amps] .82 ohm (score: 1)
Author: "kwasny" <kwasny@netzero.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 14:35:29 -0500
Yes, there were some other forces at work, I seems that there was a parasitic oscilation as one of the 1mH chokes smoked. I have installed the parasitic kit from Rich and replaced the Zener with seve
/archives//html/Amps/2004-12/msg00125.html (10,825 bytes)

8. Re: RE : [Amps] .82 ohm (score: 1)
Author: Colin Lamb <k7fm@teleport.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 12:28:59 -0800 (GMT-08:00)
"I would like to get a .82 ohm resister put back in but may test the amp with a jumper. They are mighty scarce around here as are other values. The only thing we have in this area are Radioshacks" If
/archives//html/Amps/2004-12/msg00126.html (6,914 bytes)

9. Re: RE : [Amps] .82 ohm (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 13:23:21 -0800
On Dec 7, 2004, at 9:17 AM, Colin Lamb wrote: Rich said: "if a g-g amplifier is tuned for max P-out, grid dissipation will always be reasonable" It seems that statement includes the reasons why a gri
/archives//html/Amps/2004-12/msg00127.html (13,327 bytes)

10. Re: RE : [Amps] .82 ohm (score: 1)
Author: "kwasny" <kwasny@netzero.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 16:52:59 -0500
I considered but did not want to garbage it up to bad but considering the availability of .82 ohm I think that I will use the 12x10 ohms. Darryl - K5WAS with a would be .83 ohms. That would be within
/archives//html/Amps/2004-12/msg00136.html (7,505 bytes)

11. Re: RE : [Amps] .82 ohm (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 01:05:21 -0800
On Dec 8, 2004, at 1:52 PM, kwasny wrote: I considered but did not want to garbage it up to bad but considering the availability of .82 ohm I think that I will use the 12x10 ohms. A SB-220 amplifier
/archives//html/Amps/2004-12/msg00145.html (8,832 bytes)

12. Re: RE : [Amps] .82 ohm (score: 1)
Author: Tony King <amps@w4zt.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 06:37:31 -0500
Rich hasn't mentioned the good meter protection info on his web site: <http://somis.org/D-amplifiers2.html> topic "Glitch Protection" and this diagram: <http://somis.org/D_a_02.GIF>. No use having a
/archives//html/Amps/2004-12/msg00148.html (9,411 bytes)

13. Re: RE : [Amps] .82 ohm (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 04:10:36 -0800
On Dec 9, 2004, at 3:37 AM, Tony King wrote: Rich hasn't mentioned the good meter protection info on his web site: <http://somis.org/D-amplifiers2.html> topic "Glitch Protection" and this diagram: <h
/archives//html/Amps/2004-12/msg00149.html (10,153 bytes)

14. Re: RE : [Amps] .82 ohm (score: 1)
Author: "kwasny" <kwasny@netzero.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 15:25:09 -0500
Rich, Thanks for the information on the phone this morning. I would appreciate if you would send me 2 .82 ohm 2 watt resisters. I am providing the right zip code this time :-) Please send to: Darryl
/archives//html/Amps/2004-12/msg00165.html (8,293 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu