- 1. RESULTS of the RUNNING CABLE QUERY (score: 1)
- Author: GAMMA!GAMMA!steve@gammacc.attmail.com (GAMMA!GAMMA!steve@gammacc.attmail.com)
- Date: Wed Jul 6 13:26:00 1994
- First, I'd like to thank everyone who sent suggestions; about two dozen responded to my plea for help! Those who favored burying the cable outnumbered the run-it-aboveground set by a three-to-one mar
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-07/msg00013.html (11,510 bytes)
- 2. RESULTS of the RUNNING CABLE QUERY (score: 1)
- Author: GAMMA!GAMMA!steve@gammacc.attmail.com (GAMMA!GAMMA!steve@gammacc.attmail.com)
- Date: Wed Jul 6 13:26:00 1994
- First, I'd like to thank everyone who sent suggestions; about two dozen responded to my plea for help! Those who favored burying the cable outnumbered the run-it-aboveground set by a three-to-one mar
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-07/msg00149.html (11,572 bytes)
- 3. RESULTS of the RUNNING CABLE QUERY (score: 1)
- Author: GAMMA!GAMMA!steve@gammacc.attmail.com (GAMMA!GAMMA!steve@gammacc.attmail.com)
- Date: Wed Jul 6 13:26:00 1994
- First, I'd like to thank everyone who sent suggestions; about two dozen responded to my plea for help! Those who favored burying the cable outnumbered the run-it-aboveground set by a three-to-one mar
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-07/msg00151.html (11,494 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu