- 1. Radio interfaces (score: 1)
- Author: reinc@IAEhv.nl (Rein Couperus)
- Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 01:12:15 +0100
- I was having trouble with the TR link to my OMNI VI during CQWW95 CW. I am not sure whether the cause of the problem is the RIG or the PROGRAM. The symptoms are as follows: 1: The interface will not
- /archives//html/TenTec/1995-12/msg00003.html (8,209 bytes)
- 2. Radio interfaces (score: 1)
- Author: jholly@hposl62.cup.hp.com (Jim Hollenback)
- Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 07:42:31 -0800
- as I think there is a combination of firmware and software problems on the OMNI-VI RS-232 interface. I have used WriteLog with the interface and speeds over 2400 baud causes the main tuning dial to l
- /archives//html/TenTec/1995-12/msg00004.html (9,013 bytes)
- 3. Radio interfaces (score: 1)
- Author: tree@cmicro.com (Larry Tyree)
- Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 08:52:33 -0800
- WA6SDM writes and N6TR responds: TR doesn't support 9600 baud. This is the one tradeoff I had to make to elminate any use of IRQs. I can support 4800 baud which works just fine for all the applicatio
- /archives//html/TenTec/1995-12/msg00006.html (8,838 bytes)
- 4. Radio interfaces (score: 1)
- Author: km9p@akorn.net (Bill Fisher KM9P)
- Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 13:08:43 -0500 (EST)
- I agree with this completely. Every conversation I have had with Ten-Tec has resulted in them doing more talking than me. I know what it should do... let me tell you! Instead, I get excuses about the
- /archives//html/TenTec/1995-12/msg00007.html (7,460 bytes)
- 5. Radio interfaces (score: 1)
- Author: jholly@hposl62.cup.hp.com (Jim Hollenback)
- Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 10:27:53 -0800
- Good point ... and that does raise some interesting avenues to explore. Prior to 9.26 I fibbed and told CT that my radio was a IC735 (uses the factory default address of 04). WriteLog polled, it also
- /archives//html/TenTec/1995-12/msg00008.html (8,539 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu