- 1. Rating System (score: 1)
- Author: jholly@hposl42.cup.hp.com (Jim Hollenback)
- Date: Mon Jun 7 09:20:07 1993
- The rating system Adam, AA7FT, discusses is the best suggestion I heard so far. It is a very interesting idea, and is a way to allow for winning along the way. But several questions pop up. If the co
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-06/msg00023.html (7,432 bytes)
- 2. Rating System (score: 1)
- Author: smithb@GF-WAN.af.mil (smithb@GF-WAN.af.mil)
- Date: Fri Jun 11 13:39:00 1993
- Equalization will not be discussed. (poor idea anyway) I like the rating concept base upon minimum entries from specified grid squares. As a station currently operating from North Dakoty, it would be
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-06/msg00068.html (7,015 bytes)
- 3. Rating System (score: 1)
- Author: smithb@GF-WAN.af.mil (smithb@GF-WAN.af.mil)
- Date: Fri Jun 11 13:39:00 1993
- Equalization will not be discussed. (poor idea anyway) I like the rating concept base upon minimum entries from specified grid squares. As a station currently operating from North Dakoty, it would be
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-06/msg00173.html (7,015 bytes)
- 4. Rating System (score: 1)
- Author: smithb@GF-WAN.af.mil (smithb@GF-WAN.af.mil)
- Date: Fri Jun 11 13:39:00 1993
- Equalization will not be discussed. (poor idea anyway) I like the rating concept base upon minimum entries from specified grid squares. As a station currently operating from North Dakoty, it would be
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-06/msg00189.html (6,980 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu