Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Ratings\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Ratings\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Ratings (score: 1): Author: 0004146960@mcimail.com (Adam S. Kerner); Date: Wed Jun 9 16:51:00 1993; Ah, summer-time, and things do warm up! A coupla reflections on the recent rating system discussion. I think that the idea of recognition is important. For two reasons: First, as Jim said, what's the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-06/msg00037.html (9,320 bytes)
2. Ratings (score: 1): Author: mraz@maverick.aud.alcatel.com (Kris Mraz); Date: Wed Jun 9 14:57:44 1993; The proposed rating system has a drawback, unless I missed something. Say, I have 2 contest wins and I need a third to move up. Anything less than another win would not affect me. Therefore, I would; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1993-06/msg00040.html (6,438 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]