Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*STACKING\s+\?\?\?\s+HELP\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*STACKING\s+\?\?\?\s+HELP\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. STACKING ??? HELP (score: 1): Author: musky@cybrzn.com (Scott Francois); Date: Sun, 9 Feb 1997 11:09:04 -0600; HELLO, THANKS FOR ALL REPLIES AHEAD OF TIME. MY NAME IS SCOTT-W9SF. HERE IS MY QUESTION: KT34XA AT 90FT. ANOTHER KT34XA 33FT. DOWN ON THE TOWER (57FT FROM GROUND) DUNESTAR WX0B STACK MATCH BOTH POINT; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00179.html (8,106 bytes)
2. STACKING ??? HELP (score: 1): Author: geoiii@bga.com (george fremin iii); Date: Sun, 9 Feb 1997 16:12:55 -0600 (CST); You might have the antennas out of phase - I am not sure if you have checked to make sure the connections are the same on both antennas - and I dont think you can tell the poliarty of the klm baluns; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00181.html (8,635 bytes)
3. STACKING ??? HELP (score: 1): Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider); Date: Sun, 09 Feb 1997 22:21:20 -0800; Scott, there are more variables than what you mentioned in your message. But, you have all the information and capability to answer your own question as well. The answer to your question can be readi; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00182.html (10,654 bytes)
4. STACKING ??? HELP (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Sun, 9 Feb 1997 17:36:24 -0500 (EST); 33 feet is pretty close for 20 meters. Did you model the stacking? I'd recommend some computer homework first and see where you are. One thing that can screw you up totally is to have the antennas ou; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00183.html (9,180 bytes)
5. STACKING ??? HELP (score: 1): Author: k4sb@avana.net (k4sb@avana.net); Date: Sun, 9 Feb 97 22:38:42 PST; Scott, I get the funny feeling that those guys are not broken up by insulators. If this is so, I would hate to predict the pattern.... 73, Ed -- Name: Ed Sleight E-mail: k4sb@avana.net To: <towertalk; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00186.html (8,055 bytes)
6. STACKING ??? HELP (score: 1): Author: force12@interserv.com (force12@interserv.com); Date: Sun, 9 Feb 1997 16:44:49 -0800; Hi, Scott. Have already read N3RR's reply, so will not duplicate his comments. There appears that there might be a situation in how the antennas were interconnected. Both antennas need to be in phase; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00187.html (8,716 bytes)
7. STACKING ??? HELP (score: 1): Author: hb@cpimaging.com (Howard Brainen); Date: Sun, 9 Feb 1997 18:22:21 -0800; The stack won't always be stronger, even if everything is working perfectly. It depends alot on the angle of the incoming signal. If its very low angle, you don't want to be splitting things between; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00189.html (9,861 bytes)
8. STACKING ??? HELP (score: 1): Author: jay@dunestar.com (Jay Terleski); Date: Sun, 09 Feb 1997 23:14:19 -0600; Scott, First of all thanks for the purchase of a Stack Match. You are correct and should see a better signal with both beams, most of the time. I say most since, sometimes the higher, or lower will b; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00190.html (9,725 bytes)
9. STACKING ??? HELP (score: 1): Author: sm3jla@algonet.se (Mikael Westerlund); Date: Mon, 10 Feb 1997 12:09:36 +0000; It would be intresting to have a report of the difference between the stack and the lower antenna as well as the stack and the upper antenna. The probably tells yo a lot about the array.. 73 DE Mike; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00194.html (9,312 bytes)
10. STACKING ??? HELP (score: 1): Author: fisher@hp-and2.an.hp.com (Tony Brock-Fisher); Date: Mon, 10 Feb 1997 09:34:00 -0500; Scott I have a very similar setup, and have had very similar results. Mine is XA's at 70/40, and later 80/40 feet, using in-phase feeds. I have found that the top XA is always 1-2 S-units louder on 2; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00196.html (9,240 bytes)
11. STACKING ??? HELP (score: 1): Author: SumRacer@aol.com (SumRacer@aol.com); Date: Mon, 10 Feb 1997 18:07:24 -0500 (EST); Scott - Possibly the way to >> partially << resolve if your stack is working properly is to listen to several "close in" stations as well as DX stations. Since the close in stations will have a high; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00205.html (8,597 bytes)
12. STACKING ??? HELP (score: 1): Author: k4isv@westky.com (Bud); Date: Mon, 10 Feb 1997 23:28:03 -0600; I have no experience with stacking tri-banders but have several monoband stacks... Easiest way I have ever found to check to see if antennas were in phase is check swr with both antennas pointed the; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00207.html (9,836 bytes)
13. STACKING ??? HELP (score: 1): Author: k4sb@avana.net (k4sb@avana.net); Date: Tue, 11 Feb 97 00:01:17 PST; You can take my experience with stacking, put it into a thimble, and still have room to drown yourself, but is the switching network a possible cause of this difficulty? After all, you have a 3 way s; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00213.html (7,964 bytes)
14. STACKING ??? HELP (score: 1): Author: k4isv@westky.com (Bud); Date: Tue, 11 Feb 1997 03:49:09 -0600; hi will, always gud to hear from u.... hvnt heard from u since the bus ride in dayton.... really enjoyed seeing u again... yes, the swr check works for in/out phase on stack.... i dont know why but m; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00220.html (8,582 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]